The execution of the royal family by the Bolsheviks was a falsification! The last royal family. The murder of the royal family: causes and consequences

Dmitry Baida, July 20, 2013

The last Russian Tsar was not shot, but left hostage

Regularly, by the middle of summer of each year, loud crying for the king, who was killed for no reason, is resumed. Nicholas II, whom Christians also “canonized” in 2000. Here is Comrade. Starikov, exactly on July 17, once again threw “wood” into the firebox of emotional lamentations about nothing. I was not interested in this issue before, and would not have paid attention to another dummy, BUT... At the last meeting in his life with readers, Academician Nikolai Levashov just mentioned that in the 30s Stalin met with Nicholas II and asked him for money to prepare for a future war. This is how Nikolai Goryushin writes about it in his report “ There are prophets in our fatherland too!"about this meeting with readers:

«… In this regard, the information related to tragic fate last Emperor Russian Empire Nikolai Alexandrovich Romanov and his family... In August 1917, he and his family were deported to the last capital Slavic-Aryan Empire, city of Tobolsk. The choice of this city was not accidental, since the highest degrees of Freemasonry are aware of the great past of the Russian people. The exile to Tobolsk was a kind of mockery of the Romanov dynasty, which in 1775 defeated the troops of the Slavic-Aryan Empire ( Great Tartary), and later this event was called the suppression of the peasant revolt of Emelyan Pugachev... In July 1918 Jacob Schiff gives a command to one of his trusted persons in the Bolshevik leadership Yakov Sverdlov on ritual murder royal family. Sverdlov, after consulting with Lenin, orders the commandant of Ipatiev’s house, a security officer Yakov Yurovsky carry out the plan. According to official history, on the night of July 16-17, 1918, Nikolai Romanov, along with his wife and children, was shot.

Interview with Vladimir Sychev on the Romanov case

In June 1987 I was in Venice as part of French press, who accompanied François Mitterrand at the G7 summit. During breaks between pools, an Italian journalist approached me and asked me something in French. Realizing from my accent that I was not French, he looked at my French accreditation and asked where I was from. “Russian,” I answered. - Is that so? – my interlocutor was surprised. Under his arm he held an Italian newspaper, from which he translated a huge, half-page article.

Sister Pascalina dies in a private clinic in Switzerland. She was known to the entire Catholic world, because passed with the future Pope Pius XXII from 1917, when he was still Cardinal Pacelli in Munich (Bavaria), until his death in the Vatican in 1958. She had such a strong influence on him that he entrusted her with the entire administration of the Vatican, and when the cardinals asked for an audience with the Pope, she decided who was worthy of such an audience and who was not. This is a short retelling of a long article, the meaning of which was that we had to believe the phrase uttered at the end and not by a mere mortal. Sister Pascalina asked to invite a lawyer and witnesses because she did not want to take her to the grave the secret of your life. When they appeared, she only said that the woman buried in the village Morcote, near Lake Maggiore – indeed daughter of the Russian Tsar - Olga!!

I convinced my Italian colleague that this was a gift from Fate, and that it was useless to resist it. Having learned that he was from Milan, I told him that I would not fly back to Paris on the presidential press plane, but he and I would go to this village for half a day. We went there after the summit. It turned out that this was no longer Italy, but Switzerland, but we quickly found a village, a cemetery and a cemetery watchman who led us to the grave. On the gravestone there is a photograph of an elderly woman and an inscription in German: Olga Nikolaevna(no surname), eldest daughter of Nikolai Romanov, Tsar of Russia, and dates of life – 1985-1976!!!

The Italian journalist was an excellent translator for me, but he clearly didn’t want to stay there for the whole day. All I had to do was ask questions.

– When did she live here? – In 1948.

– She said that she was the daughter of the Russian Tsar? - Of course, the whole village knew about it.

– Did this get into the press? - Yes.

– How did the other Romanovs react to this? Did they sue? - They served it.

- And she lost? - Yes, I lost.

– In this case, she had to pay the legal costs of the other party. - She paid.

- She worked? - No.

-Where does she get the money from? – Yes, the whole village knew that the Vatican was supporting her!!

The ring has closed. I went to Paris and began to look for what was known on this issue... And quickly came across a book by two English journalists.

II

Tom Mangold and Anthony Summers published the book " Dossier on the Tsar» (« The Romanov case, or the execution that never happened"). They started with the fact that if the classification of secrecy from state archives is removed after 60 years, then in 1978 60 years will expire from the signing of the Treaty of Versailles, and you can “dig up” something there by looking into the declassified archives. That is, at first the idea was just to look... And they very quickly got to telegrams English Ambassador to your Foreign Ministry that the royal family was taken from Yekaterinburg to Perm. There is no need to explain to BBC professionals that this is a sensation. They rushed to Berlin.

It quickly became clear that the Whites, having entered Yekaterinburg on July 25, immediately appointed an investigator to investigate the execution of the royal family. Nikolai Sokolov, whose book everyone still refers to, is the third investigator who received the case only at the end of February 1919! Then a simple question arises: who were the first two and what did they report to their superiors? So, the first investigator named Nametkin, appointed by Kolchak, having worked for three months and declaring that he is a professional, the matter is simple, and he does not need additional time (and the Whites were advancing and did not doubt their victory at that time - i.e. all the time is yours, don’t rush, work!), puts a report on the table stating that there was no execution, but there was a mock execution. Kolchak shelved this report and appointed a second investigator named Sergeev. He also works for three months and at the end of February hands Kolchak the same report with the same words (“I am a professional, the matter is simple, no additional time is needed,” there was no execution– there was a mock execution).

Here it is necessary to explain and remind that it was the Whites who overthrew the Tsar, not the Reds, and they sent him into exile in Siberia! Lenin was in Zurich these February days. No matter what ordinary soldiers say, the white elite are not monarchists, but republicans. And Kolchak did not need a living Tsar. I advise those who have doubts to read Trotsky’s diaries, where he writes that “if the Whites had nominated any tsar - even a peasant one - we would not have lasted even two weeks”! These are the words of the Supreme Commander-in-Chief of the Red Army and the ideologist of the Red Terror!! Please believe me.

Therefore, Kolchak already appoints “his” investigator Nikolai Sokolov and gives him a task. And Nikolai Sokolov also works for only three months - but for a different reason. The Reds entered Yekaterinburg in May, and he retreated along with the Whites. He took the archives, but what did he write?

1. He did not find any corpses, and for the police of any country in any system “no bodies - no murder” is a disappearance! After all, when arresting serial killers, the police demand to see where the corpses are hidden!! You can say anything, even about yourself, but the investigator needs physical evidence!

And Nikolai Sokolov “hangs the first noodles on his ears”: “ thrown into a mine, filled with acid" Nowadays they prefer to forget this phrase, but we heard it until 1998! And for some reason no one ever doubted it. Is it possible to fill a mine with acid? But there won't be enough acid! IN local history museum Yekaterinburg, where director Avdonin (the same one, one of the three who “accidentally” found bones on the Starokotlyakovskaya road, cleared before them by three investigators in 1918-19), there is a certificate about those soldiers on the truck that they had 78 liters of gasoline ( not acid). In July, in the Siberian taiga, with 78 liters of gasoline, you can burn the entire Moscow zoo! No, they went back and forth, first they threw it into the mine, poured it with acid, and then took it out and hid it under the sleepers...

By the way, on the night of the “execution” from July 16 to 17, 1918, a huge train with the entire local Red Army, the local Central Committee and the local Cheka left Yekaterinburg for Perm. The Whites entered on the eighth day, and Yurovsky, Beloborodov and his comrades shifted responsibility to two soldiers? Inconsistency, - tea, we were not dealing with a peasant revolt. And if they shot at their own discretion, they could have done it a month earlier.

2. The second “noodle” by Nikolai Sokolov - he describes the basement of the Ipatievsky house, publishes photographs where it is clear that there are bullets in the walls and in the ceiling (when they stage an execution, this is apparently what they do). Conclusion - the women's corsets were filled with diamonds, and the bullets ricocheted! So, this is it: the king from the throne and into exile in Siberia. Money in England and Switzerland, and they sew diamonds into corsets to sell to peasants at the market? Well well!

3. The same book by Nikolai Sokolov describes the same basement in the same Ipatiev house, where in the fireplace there are clothes from every member of the imperial family and hair from every head. Did they have their hair cut and changed (undressed??) before being shot? Not at all - they were taken out on the same train on that very “night of the execution”, but they cut their hair and changed their clothes so that no one would recognize them there.

III

Tom Magold and Anthony Summers intuitively understood that the answer to this intriguing detective story must be sought in Treaty of the Brest-Litovsk Peace. And they began to look for the original text. And what?? With all the removal of secrets after 60 years of such an official document nowhere! It is not in the declassified archives of London or Berlin. They searched everywhere - and found only quotes everywhere, but could not find them anywhere full text! And they came to the conclusion that the Kaiser demanded from Lenin that the women be extradited. The Tsar's wife was a relative of the Kaiser, his daughters were German citizens and had no right to the throne, and besides, the Kaiser at that moment could crush Lenin like a bug! And here are Lenin’s words that “ the world is humiliating and obscene, but it must be signed", and the July attempt coup d'etat Social Revolutionaries with those who joined them in Bolshoi Theater Dzerzhinsky takes on a completely different look.

Officially, we were taught that Trotsky signed the Treaty only on the second attempt and only after the start of the German army’s offensive, when it became clear to everyone that the Republic of Soviets could not resist. If there is simply no army, what is “humiliating and obscene” here? Nothing. But if it is necessary to hand over all the women of the royal family, and even to the Germans, and even during the First World War, then ideologically everything is in its place, and the words are read correctly. Which Lenin did, and the entire ladies’ section was handed over to the Germans in Kyiv. And immediately the murder of the German ambassador Mirbach in Moscow and the German consul in Kyiv begins to make sense.

“Dossier on the Tsar” is a fascinating investigation into one cunningly intricate intrigue of world history. The book was published in 1979, so the words of sister Paskalina in 1983 about Olga’s grave could not have been included in it. And if there were no new facts, there would be no point in simply retelling someone else’s book here...

Royal family. Was there an execution?

THE ROYAL FAMILY - LIFE AFTER THE "EXECUTATION"

History, like a corrupt girl, falls under every new “king”. That's recent history our country has been rewritten many times. “Responsible” and “unbiased” historians rewrote biographies and changed the fates of people in the Soviet and post-Soviet periods.

But today access to many archives is open. Only conscience is the key. What gets to people bit by bit does not leave those who live in Russia indifferent. Those who want to be proud of their country and raise their children to be patriots of their native land.

In Russia, historians are a dime a dozen. If you throw a stone, you will almost always hit one of them. But only 14 years have passed, and real story no one can establish the last century.

Modern henchmen of Miller and Baer are robbing the Russians in all directions. Either they will start Maslenitsa in February, mocking Russian traditions, or they will put an outright criminal under the Nobel Prize.

And then we wonder: why is this in a country with the richest resources and cultural heritage, such poor people?

Abdication of Nicholas II

Emperor Nicholas II did not abdicate the Throne. This act is “fake”. It was compiled and printed on a typewriter by the Quartermaster General of the Headquarters of the Supreme Commander-in-Chief A.S. Lukomsky and the representative of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs at the General Staff N.I. Basili.

This printed text was signed on March 2, 1917, not by Sovereign Nicholas II Alexandrovich Romanov, but by the Minister of the Imperial Court, Adjutant General, Baron Boris Fredericks.

After 4 days, the Orthodox Tsar Nicholas II was betrayed by the top of the Russian Orthodox Church, misleading all of Russia by the fact that, seeing this false act, the clergy passed it off as real. And they telegraphed it to the entire Empire and beyond its borders that the Tsar had abdicated the Throne!

On March 6, 1917, the Holy Synod of the Russian Orthodox Church heard two reports. The first is the act of “abdication” of the Sovereign Emperor Nicholas II for himself and for his son from the Throne of the Russian State and the abdication of Supreme Power, which took place on March 2, 1917. The second is the act of Grand Duke Mikhail Alexandrovich’s refusal to accept the Supreme Power, which took place on March 3, 1917.

After the hearings, pending the establishment of a form of government in the Constituent Assembly and new fundamental laws of the Russian State, they ORDERED:

“Take note of the above acts and implement them and announce them in all Orthodox churches, in urban areas - on the first day after receiving the text of these acts, and in rural areas - on the first Sunday or holiday, after the Divine Liturgy, with a prayer to the Lord God for the pacification of passions, with the proclamation of many years to the God-protected Russian Power and its Blessed Provisional Government.”

And although the top generals of the Russian Army mostly consisted of Jews, the average officer corps and several senior officials generals, such as Fyodor Arturovich Keller, did not believe this fake and decided to go to the rescue of the Emperor.

From that moment on, the split in the Army began, which turned into a Civil War!

The priesthood and the entire Russian society split.

But the Rothschilds achieved the main thing - they removed Her Lawful Sovereign from governing the country, and began to finish off Russia.

After the revolution, all the bishops and priests who betrayed the Tsar suffered death or dispersion throughout the world for perjury before the Orthodox Tsar.

To the Chairman of the V.Ch.K. No. 13666/2 comrade. Dzerzhinsky F.E. INSTRUCTION: “In accordance with the decision of the V.Ts.I.K. and the Council of People's Commissars, it is necessary to put an end to priests and religion as quickly as possible. Popovs should be arrested as counter-revolutionaries and saboteurs, and shot mercilessly and everywhere. And as much as possible. Churches are subject to closure. The temple premises should be sealed and turned into warehouses.

Chairman V. Ts. I. K. Kalinin, Chairman of the Council. adv. Commissars Ulyanov /Lenin/.”

Murder simulation

There is a lot of information about the Sovereign’s stay with his family in prison and exile, about his stay in Tobolsk and Yekaterinburg, and it is quite truthful.

Was there an execution? Or perhaps it was staged? Was it possible to escape or be taken out of Ipatiev’s house?

It turns out yes!

There was a factory nearby. In 1905, the owner, in case of capture by revolutionaries, dug an underground passage to it. When Yeltsin destroyed the house, after the decision of the Politburo, the bulldozer fell into a tunnel that no one knew about.

Thanks to Stalin and the intelligence officers of the General Staff, the Royal Family was taken to various Russian provinces, with the blessing of Metropolitan Macarius (Nevsky).

On July 22, 1918, Evgenia Popel received the keys to the empty house and sent her husband, N.N. Ipatiev, a telegram in the village of Nikolskoye about the possibility of returning to the city.

In connection with the offensive of the White Guard Army, the evacuation of Soviet institutions was underway in Yekaterinburg. Documents, property and valuables were exported, including those of the Romanov family (!).

Great excitement spread among the officers when it became known in what condition the Ipatiev House, where the Royal Family lived, was located. Those who were free from service went to the house, everyone wanted to take an active part in clarifying the question: “Where are they?”

Some inspected the house, breaking open the boarded up doors; others sorted out the lying things and papers; still others raked out the ashes from the furnaces. The fourth ones scoured the yard and garden, looking into all the basements and cellars. Everyone acted independently, not trusting each other and trying to find an answer to the question that worried everyone.

While the officers were inspecting the rooms, people who came to profit took away a lot of abandoned property, which was later found at the bazaar and flea markets.

The head of the garrison, Major General Golitsin, appointed a special commission of officers, mainly cadets of the Academy of the General Staff, chaired by Colonel Sherekhovsky. Which was tasked with dealing with the finds in the area of ​​Ganina Yama: local peasants, raking out recent fire pits, found burnt items from the Tsar’s wardrobe, including a cross with precious stones.

Captain Malinovsky received an order to explore the area of ​​​​Ganina Yama. On July 30, taking with him Sheremetyevsky, the investigator for the most important cases of the Yekaterinburg District Court A.P. Nametkin, several officers, the doctor of the Heir - V.N. Derevenko and the servant of the Sovereign - T.I. Chemodurov, he went there.

Thus began the investigation into the disappearance of Sovereign Nicholas II, the Empress, the Tsarevich and the Grand Duchesses.

Malinovsky's commission lasted about a week. But it was she who determined the area of ​​all subsequent investigative actions in Yekaterinburg and its environs. It was she who found witnesses to the cordon of the Koptyakovskaya road around Ganina Yama by the Red Army. I found those who saw a suspicious convoy that passed from Yekaterinburg into the cordon and back. I obtained evidence of the destruction there, in the fires near the mines of the Tsar's things.

After the entire staff of officers went to Koptyaki, Sherekhovsky divided the team into two parts. One, headed by Malinovsky, examined Ipatiev’s house, the other, led by Lieutenant Sheremetyevsky, began inspecting Ganina Yama.

When inspecting Ipatiev’s house, the officers of Malinovsky’s group managed to establish almost all the basic facts within a week, which the investigation later relied on.

A year after the investigations, Malinovsky, in June 1919, testified to Sokolov: “As a result of my work on the case, I developed the conviction that the August Family is alive... all the facts that I observed during the investigation are a simulation of murder.”

At the scene

On July 28, A.P. Nametkin was invited to the headquarters, and from the military authorities, since civil power had not yet been formed, he was asked to investigate the case of the Royal Family. After this, we began to inspect the Ipatiev House. Doctor Derevenko and old man Chemodurov were invited to participate in the identification of things; Professor of the Academy of the General Staff, Lieutenant General Medvedev, took part as an expert.

On July 30, Alexey Pavlovich Nametkin participated in the inspection of the mine and fires near Ganina Yama. After the inspection, the Koptyakovsky peasant handed over to Captain Politkovsky a huge diamond, which Chemodurov, who was there, recognized as a jewel belonging to Tsarina Alexandra Feodorovna.

Nametkin, inspecting Ipatiev’s house from August 2 to 8, had at his disposal publications of resolutions of the Urals Council and the Presidium of the All-Russian Central Executive Committee, which reported on the execution of Nicholas II.

An inspection of the building, traces of gunshots and signs of spilled blood confirmed known fact– possible death of people in this house.

As for the other results of the inspection of Ipatiev’s house, they left the impression of the unexpected disappearance of its inhabitants.

On August 5, 6, 7, 8, Nametkin continued to inspect Ipatiev’s house and described the state of the rooms where Nikolai Alexandrovich, Alexandra Feodorovna, the Tsarevich and the Grand Duchesses were kept. During the examination, I found many small things that, according to the valet T.I. Chemodurov and the Heir's doctor V.N. Derevenko, belonged to members of the Royal Family.

Being an experienced investigator, Nametkin, after examining the scene of the incident, stated that a mock execution took place in the Ipatiev House, and that not a single member of the Royal Family was shot there.

He repeated his data officially in Omsk, where he gave interviews on this topic to foreign, mainly American correspondents. Stating that he had evidence that the Royal Family was not killed on the night of July 16-17 and was going to publish these documents soon.

But he was forced to hand over the investigation.

War with investigators

On August 7, 1918, a meeting of the branches of the Yekaterinburg District Court was held, where, unexpectedly for prosecutor Kutuzov, contrary to agreements with the chairman of the court Glasson, the Yekaterinburg District Court, by a majority vote, decided to transfer the “case of the murder of the former Sovereign Emperor Nicholas II” to court member Ivan Aleksandrovich Sergeev .

After the case was transferred, the house where he rented the premises was burned down, which led to the destruction of Nametkin’s investigative archive.

The main difference in the work of a detective at the scene of an incident lies in what is not in the laws and textbooks in order to plan further actions for each of the significant circumstances discovered. This is why their replacement is harmful because with the departure of the previous investigator, his plan to unravel the tangle of mysteries disappears.

On August 13, A.P. Nametkin handed over the case to I.A. Sergeev on 26 numbered sheets. And after the capture of Yekaterinburg by the Bolsheviks, Nametkin was shot.

Sergeev was aware of the complexity of the upcoming investigation.

He understood that the main thing was to find the bodies of the dead. After all, in criminology there is a strict attitude: “no corpse, no murder.” They had great expectations for the expedition to Ganina Yama, where they very carefully searched the area and pumped out water from the mines. But... they found only a severed finger and a prosthetic upper jaw. True, a “corpse” was also recovered, but it was the corpse of the Grand Duchess Anastasia’s dog.

In addition, there are witnesses who saw the former Empress and her children in Perm.

Doctor Derevenko, who treated the Heir, like Botkin, who accompanied the Royal Family in Tobolsk and Yekaterinburg, testifies over and over again that the unidentified corpses delivered to him are not the Tsar and not the Heir, since the Tsar must have a mark on his head / skull / from the blow of the Japanese sabers in 1891

The clergy also knew about the liberation of the Royal Family: Patriarch St. Tikhon.

Life of the royal family after “death”

In the KGB of the USSR, on the basis of the 2nd Main Directorate, there was a special officer. department that monitored all movements of the Royal Family and their descendants across the territory of the USSR. Whether someone likes it or not, this will have to be taken into account, and, therefore, Russia’s future policy will have to be reconsidered.

Daughters Olga (lived under the name Natalia) and Tatyana were in the Diveyevo Monastery, disguised as nuns and sang in the choir of the Trinity Church. From there, Tatyana moved to the Krasnodar Territory, got married and lived in the Apsheronsky and Mostovsky districts. She was buried on September 21, 1992 in the village of Solenom, Mostovsky district.

Olga, through Uzbekistan, left for Afghanistan with the Emir of Bukhara, Seyid Alim Khan (1880 - 1944). From there - to Finland to Vyrubova. Since 1956, she lived in Vyritsa under the name of Natalya Mikhailovna Evstigneeva, where she rested in Bose on January 16, 1976 (11/15/2011 from the grave of V.K. Olga, Her fragrant relics were partially stolen by one demoniac, but were returned to Kazan Temple).

On October 6, 2012, her remaining relics were removed from the grave in the cemetery, added to those stolen and reburied near the Kazan Church.

The daughters of Nicholas II Maria and Anastasia (lived as Alexandra Nikolaevna Tugareva) were in the Glinsk Hermitage for some time. Then Anastasia moved to the Volgograd (Stalingrad) region and got married on the Tugarev farm in the Novoanninsky district. From there she moved to the station. Panfilovo, where she was buried on June 27, 1980. And her husband Vasily Evlampievich Peregudov died defending Stalingrad in January 1943. Maria moved to the Nizhny Novgorod region in the village of Arefino and was buried there on May 27, 1954.

Metropolitan John of Ladoga (Snychev, d. 1995) looked after Anastasia’s daughter Julia in Samara, and together with Archimandrite John (Maslov, d. 1991) looked after Tsarevich Alexei. Archpriest Vasily (Shvets, died 2011) looked after his daughter Olga (Natalia). The son of the youngest daughter of Nicholas II - Anastasia - Mikhail Vasilyevich Peregudov (1924 - 2001), coming from the front, worked as an architect, according to his design a railway station was built in Stalingrad-Volgograd!

Brother of Tsar Nicholas II, Grand Duke Mikhail Alexandrovich was also able to escape from Perm right under the nose of the Cheka. At first he lived in Belogorye, and then moved to Vyritsa, where he rested in Bose in 1948.

Until 1927, Tsarina Alexandra Feodorovna stayed at the Tsar's dacha (Vvedensky Skete of the Seraphim Ponetaevsky Monastery, Nizhny Novgorod Region). And at the same time she visited Kyiv, Moscow, St. Petersburg, Sukhumi. Alexandra Feodorovna took the name Ksenia (in honor of St. Ksenia Grigorievna of Petersburg /Petrova 1732 - 1803/).

In 1899, Tsarina Alexandra Feodorovna wrote a prophetic poem:

“In the solitude and silence of the monastery,

Where guardian angels fly,

Far from temptation and sin

She lives, whom everyone considers dead.

Everyone thinks she already lives

In the Divine celestial sphere.

She steps outside the walls of the monastery,

Submissive to your increased faith!”

The Empress met with Stalin, who told Her the following: “Live quietly in the city of Starobelsk, but there is no need to interfere in politics.”

Stalin's patronage saved the Tsarina when local security officers opened criminal cases against her.

Money transfers were regularly received from France and Japan in the name of the Queen. The Empress received them and donated them to four kindergartens. This was confirmed by the former manager of the Starobelsky branch of the State Bank, Ruf Leontyevich Shpilev, and the chief accountant Klokolov.

The Empress did handicrafts, making blouses, scarves, and for making hats she was sent straws from Japan. All this was done on orders from local fashionistas.

Empress Alexandra Feodorovna

In 1931, the Tsarina appeared at the Starobelsky okrot department of the GPU and stated that she had 185,000 marks in her account in the Berlin Reichsbank, as well as $300,000 in the Chicago Bank. She allegedly wants to put all these funds at the disposal of the Soviet government, provided that it provides for her old age.

The Empress’s statement was forwarded to the GPU of the Ukrainian SSR, which instructed the so-called “Credit Bureau” to negotiate with foreign countries about receiving these deposits!

In 1942, Starobelsk was occupied, the Empress on the same day was invited to breakfast with Colonel General Kleist, who invited her to move to Berlin, to which the Empress replied with dignity: “I am Russian and I want to die in my homeland.” Then she was offered to choose any house in the city that she wanted: it was not suitable, they say, for such a person to huddle in a cramped dugout. But she refused that too.

The only thing the Queen agreed to was to use the services of German doctors. True, the city commandant still ordered to install a sign at the Empress’s home with the inscription in Russian and German: “Do not disturb Her Majesty.”

Which she was very happy about, because in her dugout behind the screen there were... wounded Soviet tankers.

The German medicine was very useful. The tankers managed to get out, and they safely crossed the front line. Taking advantage of the favor of the authorities, Tsarina Alexandra Feodorovna saved many prisoners of war and local residents who were threatened with reprisals.

Empress Alexandra Feodorovna, under the name of Xenia, lived in the city of Starobelsk, Lugansk region, from 1927 until her death in 1948. She took monastic tonsure in the name of Alexandra at the Starobelsky Holy Trinity Monastery.

Kosygin - Tsarevich Alexei

Tsarevich Alexei - became Alexei Nikolaevich Kosygin (1904 - 1980). Twice Hero of Social. Labor (1964, 1974). Knight Grand Cross of the Order of the Sun of Peru. In 1935, he graduated from the Leningrad Textile Institute. In 1938, head. department of the Leningrad regional party committee, chairman of the executive committee of the Leningrad City Council.

Wife Klavdiya Andreevna Krivosheina (1908 - 1967) - niece of A. A. Kuznetsov. Daughter Lyudmila (1928 - 1990) was married to Jermen Mikhailovich Gvishiani (1928 - 2003). Son of Mikhail Maksimovich Gvishiani (1905 - 1966) since 1928 in the State Political Directorate of Internal Affairs of Georgia. In 1937-38 deputy Chairman of the Tbilisi City Executive Committee. In 1938, 1st deputy. People's Commissar of the NKVD of Georgia. In 1938 – 1950 beginning UNKVDUNKGBUMGB Primorsky Krai. In 1950 - 1953 beginning UMGB Kuibyshev region. Grandsons Tatyana and Alexey.

The Kosygin family was friends with the families of the writer Sholokhov, composer Khachaturian, and rocket designer Chelomey.

In 1940 – 1960 – deputy prev Council of People's Commissars - Council of Ministers of the USSR. In 1941 - deputy. prev Council for the evacuation of industry to the eastern regions of the USSR. From January to July 1942 - authorized State Committee defense in besieged Leningrad. Participated in the evacuation of the population and industrial enterprises and property of Tsarskoe Selo. The Tsarevich walked around Ladoga on the yacht “Standard” and knew the surroundings of the Lake well, so he organized the “Road of Life” across the Lake to supply the city.

Alexey Nikolaevich created an electronics center in Zelenograd, but enemies in the Politburo did not allow him to bring this idea to fruition. And today Russia is forced to purchase household appliances and computers from all over the world.

The Sverdlovsk Region produced everything from strategic missiles to bacteriological weapons, and was filled with underground cities hiding under the symbols “Sverdlovsk-42”, and there were more than two hundred such “Sverdlovsks”.

He helped Palestine as Israel expanded its borders at the expense of Arab lands.

He implemented projects for the development of gas and oil fields in Siberia.

But the Jews, members of the Politburo, made exports the main line of the budget crude oil and gas - instead of exporting processed products, as Kosygin (Romanov) wanted.

In 1949, during the promotion of G. M. Malenkov’s “Leningrad Affair,” Kosygin miraculously survived. During the investigation, Mikoyan, deputy. Chairman of the Council of Ministers of the USSR, “organized Kosygin’s long trip around Siberia, due to the need to strengthen cooperation activities and improve the procurement of agricultural products.” Stalin agreed on this business trip with Mikoyan on time, because he was poisoned and from the beginning of August to the end of December 1950 lay in his dacha, miraculously remaining alive!

When addressing Alexei, Stalin affectionately called him “Kosyga”, since he was his nephew. Sometimes Stalin called him Tsarevich in front of everyone.

In the 60s Tsarevich Alexei, realizing the inefficiency existing system, proposed a transition from a social economy to a real one. Keep records of sold, not manufactured, products as the main indicator of enterprise performance, etc. Alexey Nikolaevich Romanov normalized relations between the USSR and China during the conflict on the island. Damansky, meeting at the airport in Beijing with the Premier of the State Council of the People's Republic of China, Zhou Enlai.

Alexey Nikolaevich visited the Venevsky Monastery in the Tula region and communicated with the nun Anna, who was in touch with the entire Royal family. He even once gave her a diamond ring for clear predictions. And shortly before his death he came to her, and she told him that He would die on December 18!

The death of Tsarevich Alexei coincided with the birthday of L.I. Brezhnev on December 18, 1980, and during these days the country did not know that Kosygin had died.

The ashes of the Tsarevich have been resting in the Kremlin wall since December 24, 1980!

There was no memorial service for the August Family

The Royal Family: real life after an imaginary execution
Until 1927, the Royal Family met on the stones of St. Seraphim of Sarov, next to the Tsar’s dacha, on the territory of the Vvedensky Skete of the Seraphim-Ponetaevsky Monastery. Now all that remains of the Skete is the former baptismal sanctuary. It was closed in 1927 by the NKVD. This was preceded by general searches, after which all the nuns were relocated to different monasteries in Arzamas and Ponetaevka. And icons, jewelry, bells and other property were taken to Moscow.

In the 20s - 30s. Nicholas II stayed in Diveevo at st. Arzamasskaya, 16, in the house of Alexandra Ivanovna Grashkina - schemanun Dominica (1906 - 2009).

Stalin built a dacha in Sukhumi next to the dacha of the Royal Family and came there to meet with the Emperor and his cousin Nicholas II.

In the uniform of an officer, Nicholas II visited Stalin in the Kremlin, as confirmed by General Vatov (d. 2004), who served in Stalin’s guard.

Marshal Mannerheim, having become the President of Finland, immediately withdrew from the war, as he secretly communicated with the Emperor. And in Mannerheim’s office there hung a portrait of Nicholas II. Confessor of the Royal Family since 1912, Fr. Alexey (Kibardin, 1882 - 1964), living in Vyritsa, cared for a woman who arrived there from Finland in 1956 as a permanent resident. the Tsar's eldest daughter, Olga.

In Sofia after the revolution, in the building of the Holy Synod on St. Alexander Nevsky Square, the confessor of the Highest Family, Vladyka Feofan (Bistrov), lived.

Vladyka never served a memorial service for the August Family and told his cell attendant that the Royal Family was alive! And even in April 1931 he went to Paris to meet with Tsar Nicholas II and the people who freed the Royal Family from captivity. Bishop Theophan also said that over time the Romanov Family would be restored, but through the female line.

Expertise

Head Department of Biology of the Ural Medical Academy Oleg Makeev said: “Genetic examination after 90 years is not only complicated due to the changes that have occurred in bone tissue, but also cannot give an absolute result even if it is carried out carefully. The methodology used in the studies already conducted is still not recognized as evidence by any court in the world.”

The foreign expert commission to investigate the fate of the Royal Family, created in 1989, chaired by Pyotr Nikolaevich Koltypin-Vallovsky, ordered a study by scientists at Stanford University and received data on the DNA discrepancy between the “Ekaterinburg remains”.

The commission provided for DNA analysis a fragment of the finger of V.K. St. Elizabeth Feodorovna Romanova, whose relics are kept in the Jerusalem Church of Mary Magdalene.

“The sisters and their children should have identical mitochondrial DNA, but the results of the analysis of the remains of Elizaveta Fedorovna do not correspond to the previously published DNA of the alleged remains of Alexandra Fedorovna and her daughters,” was the conclusion of the scientists.

The experiment was carried out by an international team of scientists led by Dr. Alec Knight, a molecular taxonomist from Stanford University, with the participation of geneticists from Eastern Michigan University, Los Alamos National Laboratory, with the participation of Dr. Lev Zhivotovsky, an employee of the Institute of General Genetics of the Russian Academy of Sciences.

After the death of an organism, the DNA begins to quickly decompose (cut) into pieces, and the more time passes, the more these parts are shortened. After 80 years, without creating special conditions, DNA segments longer than 200–300 nucleotides are not preserved. And in 1994, during analysis, a segment of 1,223 nucleotides was isolated.”

Thus, Pyotr Koltypin-Vallovskoy emphasized: “Geneticists again refuted the results of the examination carried out in 1994 in the British laboratory, on the basis of which it was concluded that the “Ekaterinburg remains” belonged to Tsar Nicholas II and his Family.”

Japanese scientists presented the Moscow Patriarchate with the results of their research regarding the “Ekaterinburg remains”.

On December 7, 2004, in the MP building, Bishop Alexander of Dmitrov, vicar of the Moscow Diocese, met with Dr. Tatsuo Nagai. Doctor of Biological Sciences, Professor, Director of the Department of Forensic and Scientific Medicine at Kitazato University (Japan). Since 1987, he has been working at Kitazato University, is vice-dean of the Joint School of Medical Sciences, director and professor of the Department of Clinical Hematology and the Department of Forensic Medicine. He published 372 scientific papers and made 150 presentations at international medical conferences in various countries. Member Royal Society medicine in London.

He identified the mitochondrial DNA of the last Russian Emperor Nicholas II. During the assassination attempt on Tsarevich Nicholas II in Japan in 1891, his handkerchief remained there and was applied to the wound. It turned out that the DNA structures from the cuts in 1998 in the first case differ from the DNA structure in both the second and third cases. Led by Dr. Nagai research group took a sample of dried sweat from the clothes of Nicholas II, stored in the Catherine Palace of Tsarskoye Selo, and performed a mitochondrial analysis of it.

In addition, mitochondrial DNA analysis was performed on hair, lower jaw bone and nails. thumb V.K. Georgiy Alexandrovich, buried in the Peter and Paul Cathedral, younger brother Nicholas II. He compared DNA from bone cuts buried in 1998 in the Peter and Paul Fortress with blood samples from Emperor Nicholas II’s own nephew Tikhon Nikolaevich, as well as with samples of the sweat and blood of Tsar Nicholas II himself.

Dr. Nagai's conclusions: "We obtained different results from those obtained by Drs. Peter Gill and Dr. Pavel Ivanov in five respects."

Glorification of the King

Sobchak (Finkelstein, d. 2000), while mayor of St. Petersburg, committed a monstrous crime - he issued death certificates for Nicholas II and his family members to Leonida Georgievna. He issued certificates in 1996 - without even waiting for the conclusions of Nemtsov’s “official commission”.

The “protection of the rights and legitimate interests” of the “imperial house” in Russia began in 1995 by the late Leonida Georgievna, who, on behalf of her daughter, the “head of the Russian imperial house,” applied for state registration of the deaths of members of the Imperial House killed in 1918–1919. , and issuing death certificates."

On December 1, 2005, an application was submitted to the Prosecutor General's Office for the “rehabilitation of Emperor Nicholas II and members of his family.” This application was submitted on behalf of “Princess” Maria Vladimirovna by her lawyer G. Yu. Lukyanov, who replaced Sobchak in this post.

The glorification of the Royal Family, although it took place under Ridiger (Alexy II) at the Council of Bishops, was just a cover for the “consecration” of the Temple of Solomon.

After all, the king can only be glorified among the Saints Local Council. Because the King is the exponent of the Spirit of the entire people, and not just the Priesthood. That is why the decision of the Council of Bishops in 2000 must be approved by the Local Council.

According to ancient canons, glorify God's saints possible after healings from various ailments occur at their graves. After this, it is checked how this or that ascetic lived. If he lived a righteous life, then healings come from God. If not, then such healings are performed by the Demon, and they will later turn into new diseases.

In order to be convinced from your own experience, you need to go to the grave of Emperor Nicholas II, in Nizhny Novgorod at the Red Etna cemetery, where he was buried on December 26, 1958.

The funeral service and burial of Sovereign Emperor Nicholas II was performed by the famous Nizhny Novgorod elder and priest Gregory (Dolbunov, d. 1996).

Whoever the Lord grants to go to the grave and be healed will be able to see it from his own experience.

The transfer of His relics is yet to take place at the federal level.

Sergey Zhelenkov

The Romanovs were not shot (Levashov N.V.)

16 Dec 2012. A private video in which a Russian journalist in the past talks about an Italian who wrote an article about witnesses that the Romanovs were alive... The video contains a photograph of the grave of the eldest daughter of Nicholas II, who died in 1976...
Interview with Vladimir Sychev on the Romanov case
A most interesting interview with Vladimir Sychev, who refutes the official version of the execution of the royal family. He talks about the grave of Olga Romanova in northern Italy, about the investigation of two British journalists, about the conditions of the Brest Peace of 1918, under which all the women of the royal family were handed over to the Germans in Kyiv...

On the night of July 16-17, 1918 in the city of Yekaterinburg, in the basement of the house of mining engineer Nikolai Ipatiev, Russian Emperor Nicholas II, his wife Empress Alexandra Feodorovna, their children - Grand Duchesses Olga, Tatiana, Maria, Anastasia, heir Tsarevich Alexei, as well as life -medic Evgeny Botkin, valet Alexey Trupp, room girl Anna Demidova and cook Ivan Kharitonov.

The last Russian emperor Nikolai Alexandrovich Romanov (Nicholas II) ascended the throne in 1894 after the death of the emperor's father Alexandra III and ruled until 1917, until the situation in the country became more complicated. On March 12 (February 27, old style), 1917, an armed uprising began in Petrograd, and on March 15 (March 2, old style), 1917, at the insistence of the Provisional Committee State Duma Nicholas II signed an abdication of the throne for himself and his son Alexei in favor of his younger brother Mikhail Alexandrovich.

After his abdication, from March to August 1917, Nicholas and his family were under arrest in the Alexander Palace of Tsarskoe Selo. A special commission of the Provisional Government studied materials for the possible trial of Nicholas II and Empress Alexandra Feodorovna on charges of treason. Having not found evidence and documents that clearly convicted them of this, the Provisional Government was inclined to deport them abroad (to Great Britain).

In August 1917, the arrested were transported to Tobolsk. The main idea of ​​the Bolshevik leadership was an open trial of the former emperor. In April 1918, the All-Russian Central Executive Committee decided to transfer the Romanovs to Moscow. For the trial former king Vladimir Lenin spoke out, it was supposed to make Leon Trotsky the main accuser of Nicholas II. However, information appeared about the existence of “White Guard conspiracies” to kidnap the Tsar, the concentration of “conspiratorial officers” in Tyumen and Tobolsk for this purpose, and on April 6, 1918, the Presidium of the All-Russian Central Executive Committee decided to transfer the royal family to the Urals. The royal family was transported to Yekaterinburg and placed in the Ipatiev house.

The uprising of the White Czechs and the offensive of the White Guard troops on Yekaterinburg accelerated the decision to shoot the former tsar.

The commandant of the House was instructed to organize the execution of all members of the royal family, Doctor Botkin and the servants who were in the house. special purpose Yakov Yurovsky.

© Photo: Museum of the History of Yekaterinburg

The execution scene is known from investigative reports, from the words of participants and eyewitnesses, and from the stories of the direct perpetrators. Yurovsky spoke about the execution of the royal family in three documents: “Note” (1920); "Memoirs" (1922) and "Speech at a meeting of old Bolsheviks in Yekaterinburg" (1934). All the details of this crime, conveyed by the main participant in different time and under completely different circumstances, they agree on how the royal family and its servants were shot.

Based on documentary sources, it is possible to establish the time when the murder of Nicholas II, members of his family and their servants began. The car that delivered the last order to exterminate the family arrived at half past two on the night of July 16-17, 1918. After which the commandant ordered physician Botkin to wake up the royal family. It took the family about 40 minutes to get ready, then she and the servants were transferred to the semi-basement of this house, with a window overlooking Voznesensky Lane. Nicholas II carried Tsarevich Alexei in his arms because he could not walk due to illness. At Alexandra Feodorovna’s request, two chairs were brought into the room. She sat on one, and Tsarevich Alexei sat on the other. The rest were located along the wall. Yurovsky led the firing squad into the room and read the verdict.

This is how Yurovsky himself describes the execution scene: “I invited everyone to stand up. Everyone stood up, occupying the entire wall and one of the side walls. The room was very small. Nikolai stood with his back to me. I announced that the Executive Committee of the Councils of Workers', Peasants' and Soldiers' Deputies Ural ordered to shoot them. Nikolai turned and asked. I repeated the order and commanded: “I shot first and killed Nikolai on the spot. The shooting took a very long time and, despite my hopes, wooden wall will not give a ricochet, the bullets bounced off it. For a long time I was unable to stop this shooting, which had become careless. But when I finally managed to stop, I saw that many were still alive. For example, Doctor Botkin lay leaning on the elbow of his right hand, as if in a resting position, and finished off him with a revolver shot. Alexey, Tatyana, Anastasia and Olga were also alive. Demidova was also alive. Comrade Ermakov wanted to finish the matter with a bayonet. But, however, this did not work. The reason became clear later (the daughters were wearing diamond armor like bras). I was forced to shoot each one in turn."

After death was confirmed, all the corpses began to be transferred to the truck. At the beginning of the fourth hour, at dawn, the corpses of the dead were taken out of Ipatiev’s house.

The remains of Nicholas II, Alexandra Fedorovna, Olga, Tatiana and Anastasia Romanov, as well as people from their entourage, shot in the House of Special Purpose (Ipatiev House), were discovered in July 1991 near Yekaterinburg.

On July 17, 1998, the burial of the remains of members of the royal family took place in the Peter and Paul Cathedral of St. Petersburg.

In October 2008, the Presidium of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation decided to rehabilitate Russian Emperor Nicholas II and members of his family. The Russian Prosecutor General's Office also decided to rehabilitate members of the imperial family - the Grand Dukes and Princes of the Blood, executed by the Bolsheviks after the revolution. Servants and associates of the royal family who were executed by the Bolsheviks or subjected to repression were rehabilitated.

In January 2009, the Main Investigation Department of the Investigative Committee under the Prosecutor's Office of the Russian Federation stopped investigating the case into the circumstances of the death and burial of the last Russian emperor, members of his family and people from his entourage, shot in Yekaterinburg on July 17, 1918, "due to the expiration of the statute of limitations for bringing criminal charges responsibility and death of persons who committed premeditated murder" (subparagraphs 3 and 4 of part 1 of article 24 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the RSFSR).

On January 15, 2009, the investigator issued a resolution to terminate the criminal case, but on August 26, 2010, the judge of the Basmanny District Court of Moscow decided, in accordance with Article 90 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation, to recognize this decision as unfounded and ordered the violations to be eliminated. On November 25, 2010, the investigation decision to terminate this case was canceled by the Deputy Chairman of the Investigative Committee.

On January 14, 2011, the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation reported that the resolution was brought in accordance with court decision and the criminal case into the death of representatives of the Russian Imperial House and people from their entourage in 1918-1919 was discontinued. The identification of the remains of members of the family of the former Russian Emperor Nicholas II (Romanov) and persons from his retinue has been confirmed.

On October 27, 2011, a resolution was issued to terminate the investigation into the case of the execution of the royal family. The 800-page resolution outlines the main conclusions of the investigation and indicates the authenticity of the discovered remains of the royal family.

However, the question of authentication still remains open. Russian Orthodox Church in order to recognize the found remains as relics royal martyrs, The Russian Imperial House supports the position of the Russian Orthodox Church on this issue. The director of the chancellery of the Russian Imperial House emphasized that genetic testing is not enough.

The Church canonized Nicholas II and his family and on July 17 celebrates the day of remembrance of the Holy Royal Passion-Bearers.

The material was prepared based on information from RIA Novosti and open sources

According to official history, on the night of July 16-17, 1918, Nikolai Romanov, along with his wife and children, was shot. After opening the burial and identifying the remains in 1998, they were reburied in the tomb of the Peter and Paul Cathedral in St. Petersburg. However, then the Russian Orthodox Church did not confirm their authenticity.

“I cannot exclude that the church will recognize the royal remains as authentic if convincing evidence of their authenticity is discovered and if the examination is open and honest,” Metropolitan Hilarion of Volokolamsk, head of the Department for External Church Relations of the Moscow Patriarchate, said in July of this year.

As is known, the Russian Orthodox Church did not participate in the burial of the remains of the royal family in 1998, explaining this by the fact that the church is not sure whether the original remains of the royal family are buried. The Russian Orthodox Church refers to a book by Kolchak investigator Nikolai Sokolov, who concluded that all the bodies were burned. Some of the remains collected by Sokolov at the burning site are kept in Brussels, in the Church of St. Job the Long-Suffering, and they have not been examined. At one time, a version of Yurovsky’s note, who supervised the execution and burial, was found - it became the main document before the transfer of the remains (along with the book of investigator Sokolov). And now, in the coming year of the 100th anniversary of the execution of the Romanov family, the Russian Orthodox Church has been instructed to give a final answer to all dark places execution near Yekaterinburg. To obtain a final answer, research has been carried out for several years under the auspices of the Russian Orthodox Church. Again, historians, geneticists, graphologists, pathologists and other specialists are rechecking the facts, powerful scientific forces and the forces of the prosecutor's office are again involved, and all these actions again take place under a thick veil of secrecy.

Genetic identification research is carried out by four independent groups of scientists. Two of them are foreign, working directly with the Russian Orthodox Church. At the beginning of July 2017, the secretary of the church commission for studying the results of the study of the remains found near Yekaterinburg, Bishop Tikhon (Shevkunov) of Yegoryevsk announced: it has opened a large number of new circumstances and new documents. For example, Sverdlov’s order to execute Nicholas II was found. In addition, based on the results of recent research, criminologists have confirmed that the remains of the Tsar and Tsarina belong to them, since a mark was suddenly found on the skull of Nicholas II, which is interpreted as a mark from a saber blow he received while visiting Japan. As for the queen, dentists identified her using the world's first porcelain veneers on platinum pins.

Although, if you open the conclusion of the commission, written before the burial in 1998, it says: the bones of the sovereign’s skull are so destroyed that the characteristic callus cannot be found. The same conclusion noted severe damage teeth of Nikolai's presumed remains due to periodontal disease, since this person I've never been to the dentist. This confirms that it was not the tsar who was shot, since the records of the Tobolsk dentist whom Nikolai contacted remained. In addition, no explanation has yet been found for the fact that the height of the skeleton of “Princess Anastasia” is 13 centimeters greater than her lifetime height. Well, as you know, miracles happen in the church... Shevkunov did not say a word about genetic testing, and this despite the fact that genetic studies in 2003 conducted by Russian and American specialists showed that the genome of the body of the supposed empress and her sister Elizabeth Feodorovna did not match , which means no relationship.

On this topic

In addition, in the museum of the city of Otsu (Japan) there are things left after the policeman wounded Nicholas II. They contain biological material that can be examined. Based on them, Japanese geneticists from Tatsuo Nagai’s group proved that the DNA of the remains of “Nicholas II” from near Yekaterinburg (and his family) does not 100% match the DNA of biomaterials from Japan. During the Russian DNA examination, second cousins ​​were compared, and in the conclusion it was written that “there are matches.” The Japanese compared relatives of cousins. There are also the results of a genetic examination of the President of the International Association of Forensic Physicians, Mr. Bonte from Dusseldorf, in which he proved: the found remains and doubles of the Nicholas II Filatov family are relatives. Perhaps, from their remains in 1946, the “remains of the royal family” were created? The problem has not been studied.

Earlier, in 1998, the Russian Orthodox Church, on the basis of these conclusions and facts, did not recognize the existing remains as authentic, but what will happen now? In December, all conclusions of the Investigative Committee and the ROC commission will be considered by the Council of Bishops. It is he who will decide on the church’s attitude towards the Yekaterinburg remains. Let's see why everything is so nervous and what is the history of this crime?

This kind of money is worth fighting for

Today, some of the Russian elites have suddenly awakened an interest in one very piquant history of relations between Russia and the United States, connected with the Romanov royal family. Briefly, this story is as follows: more than 100 years ago, in 1913, the Federal backup system(Fed) – the central bank and printing press for the production of international currency, still in operation today. The Fed was created for the newly created League of Nations (now the UN) and would be a single global financial center with its own currency. Russia contributed 48,600 tons of gold to the “authorized capital” of the system. But the Rothschilds demanded that Woodrow Wilson, who was then re-elected as US President, transfer the center to their private ownership along with the gold. The organization became known as the Federal Reserve System, where Russia owned 88.8%, and 11.2% belonged to 43 international beneficiaries. Receipts stating that 88.8% of gold assets for a period of 99 years are under the control of the Rothschilds were transferred in six copies to the family of Nicholas II. The annual income on these deposits was fixed at 4%, which was supposed to be transferred to Russia annually, but was deposited in the X-1786 account of the World Bank and in 300 thousand accounts in 72 international banks. All these documents confirming the right to the gold pledged to the Federal Reserve from Russia in the amount of 48,600 tons, as well as income from leasing it, were deposited by the mother of Tsar Nicholas II, Maria Fedorovna Romanova, for safekeeping in one of the Swiss banks. But only heirs have conditions for access there, and this access is controlled by the Rothschild clan. Gold certificates were issued for the gold provided by Russia, which made it possible to claim the metal in parts - the royal family hid them in different places. Later, in 1944, the Bretton Woods Conference confirmed Russia's right to 88% of the Fed's assets.

This “golden” question was once proposed to be addressed by two well-known Russian oligarch– Roman Abramovich and Boris Berezovsky. But Yeltsin “didn’t understand” them, and now, apparently, that very “golden” time has come... And now this gold is remembered more and more often - though not at the state level.

On this topic

In Lahore, Pakistan, 16 police officers were arrested for the shooting of an innocent family on the streets of the city. According to eyewitnesses, the police stopped a car traveling to the wedding and brutally dealt with its driver and passengers.

People kill for this gold, fight for it, and make fortunes from it.

Today's researchers believe that all wars and revolutions in Russia and in the world occurred because the Rothschild clan and the United States did not intend to return gold to the Federal Reserve System of Russia. After all, the execution of the royal family made it possible for the Rothschild clan not to give up the gold and not pay for its 99-year lease. “Currently, out of three Russian copies of the agreement on gold invested in the Fed, two are in our country, the third is presumably in one of the Swiss banks,” says researcher Sergei Zhilenkov. – In a cache in the Nizhny Novgorod region, there are documents from the royal archive, among which there are 12 “gold” certificates. If they are presented, the global financial hegemony of the USA and the Rothschilds will simply collapse, and our country will receive huge money and all the opportunities for development, since it will no longer be strangled from overseas,” the historian is sure.

Many wanted to close the questions about the royal assets with the reburial. Professor Vladlen Sirotkin also has a calculation for the so-called war gold exported to the First World War and Civil War to the West and East: Japan - 80 billion dollars, Great Britain - 50 billion, France - 25 billion, USA - 23 billion, Sweden - 5 billion, Czech Republic - 1 billion dollars. Total – 184 billion. Surprisingly officials For example, in the USA and Great Britain these figures are not disputed, but they are surprised at the lack of requests from Russia. By the way, the Bolsheviks remembered Russian assets in the West in the early 20s. Back in 1923, People's Commissar foreign trade Leonid Krasin ordered a British investigative law firm to evaluate Russian real estate and cash deposits abroad. By 1993, this company reported that it had already accumulated a data bank worth 400 billion dollars! And this is legal Russian money.

Why did the Romanovs die? Britain did not accept them!

There is a long-term study, unfortunately, by the now deceased professor Vladlen Sirotkin (MGIMO) “Foreign Gold of Russia” (Moscow, 2000), where the gold and other holdings of the Romanov family, accumulated in the accounts of Western banks, are also estimated at no less than 400 billion dollars, and together with investments - more than 2 trillion dollars! In the absence of heirs from the Romanov side, the closest relatives turn out to be members of the English royal family... Whose interests may be behind many events of the 19th–21st centuries... By the way, it is not clear (or, on the contrary, it is clear) for what reasons the royal house of England refused the family three times The Romanovs are in refuge. The first time in 1916, in the apartment of Maxim Gorky, an escape was planned - the rescue of the Romanovs by kidnapping and internment of the royal couple during their visit to an English warship, which was then sent to Great Britain. The second was Kerensky's request, which was also rejected. Then the Bolsheviks’ request was not accepted. And this despite the fact that the mothers of George V and Nicholas II were sisters. In surviving correspondence, Nicholas II and George V call each other “Cousin Nicky” and “Cousin Georgie” - they were cousins with an age difference of less than three years, and in their youth these guys spent a lot of time together and were very similar in appearance. As for the queen, her mother, Princess Alice, was the eldest and beloved daughter of Queen Victoria of England. At that time, England held 440 tons of gold from Russia’s gold reserves and 5.5 tons of Nicholas II’s personal gold as collateral for military loans. Now think about it: if the royal family died, then who would the gold go to? To the closest relatives! Is this the reason why cousin Georgie refused to accept cousin Nicky's family? To obtain gold, its owners had to die. Officially. And now all this needs to be connected with the burial of the royal family, which will officially testify that the owners of untold wealth are dead.

Versions of life after death

All versions of the death of the royal family that exist today can be divided into three. First version: the royal family was shot near Yekaterinburg, and its remains, with the exception of Alexei and Maria, were reburied in St. Petersburg. The remains of these children were found in 2007, all examinations were carried out on them, and they will apparently be buried on the 100th anniversary of the tragedy. If this version is confirmed, for accuracy it is necessary to once again identify all the remains and repeat all examinations, especially genetic and pathological anatomical ones. Second version: the royal family was not shot, but was scattered throughout Russia and all family members died a natural death, having lived their lives in Russia or abroad, while in Yekaterinburg a family of doubles was shot (members of the same family or people from different families, but similar on members of the emperor's family). Nicholas II had doubles after Bloody Sunday 1905. When leaving the palace, three carriages left. It is unknown which of them Nicholas II sat in. The Bolsheviks, having captured the archives of the 3rd department in 1917, had data of doubles. There is an assumption that one of the families of doubles - the Filatovs, who are distantly related to the Romanovs - followed them to Tobolsk. Third version: the intelligence services added false remains to the burials of members of the royal family as they died naturally or before opening the grave. To do this, it is necessary to very carefully monitor, among other things, the age of the biomaterial.

Let us present one of the versions of the historian of the royal family Sergei Zhelenkov, which seems to us the most logical, although very unusual.

Before investigator Sokolov, the only investigator who published a book about the execution of the royal family, there were investigators Malinovsky, Nametkin (his archive was burned along with his house), Sergeev (removed from the case and killed), Lieutenant General Diterichs, Kirsta. All these investigators concluded that the royal family was not killed. Neither the Reds nor the Whites wanted to disclose this information - they understood that American bankers were primarily interested in obtaining objective information. The Bolsheviks were interested in the tsar's money, and Kolchak declared himself the Supreme Ruler of Russia, which could not happen with a living sovereign.

Investigator Sokolov was conducting two cases - one on the fact of murder and the other on the fact of disappearance. At the same time, military intelligence, represented by Kirst, conducted an investigation. When the whites left Russia, Sokolov, fearing for collected materials, sent them to Harbin - some of his materials were lost along the way. Sokolov’s materials contained evidence of the financing of the Russian revolution by the American bankers Schiff, Kuhn and Loeb, and Ford, who was in conflict with these bankers, became interested in these materials. He even called Sokolov from France, where he settled, to the USA. When returning from the USA to France, Nikolai Sokolov was killed. Sokolov’s book was published after his death, and many people “worked” on it, removing many scandalous facts from it, so it cannot be considered completely truthful. The surviving members of the royal family were watched by people from the KGB, where a special department was created for this purpose, dissolved during perestroika. The archives of this department have been preserved. The royal family was saved by Stalin - the royal family was evacuated from Yekaterinburg through Perm to Moscow and came into the possession of Trotsky, then the People's Commissar of Defense. To further save the royal family, Stalin carried out an entire operation, stealing it from Trotsky’s people and taking them to Sukhumi, to a specially built house next to old home royal family. From there, all family members were distributed to different places, Maria and Anastasia were taken to the Glinsk Hermitage (Sumy region), then Maria was transported to the Nizhny Novgorod region, where she died of illness on May 24, 1954. Anastasia subsequently married Stalin’s personal guard and lived very secluded on a small farm, died

June 27, 1980 in the Volgograd region. The eldest daughters, Olga and Tatyana, were sent to Serafimo-Diveevsky convent– the empress was settled not far from the girls. But they did not live here for long. Olga, having traveled through Afghanistan, Europe and Finland, settled in Vyritsa, Leningrad region, where she died on January 19, 1976. Tatyana lived partly in Georgia, partly in the Krasnodar Territory, and was buried in Krasnodar region, died September 21, 1992. Alexey and his mother lived at their dacha, then Alexey was transported to Leningrad, where they “did” a biography on him, and the whole world recognized him as party and Soviet leader Alexei Nikolaevich Kosygin (Stalin sometimes called him Tsarevich in front of everyone). Nicholas II lived and died in Nizhny Novgorod(December 22, 1958), and the queen died in the village of Starobelskaya, Lugansk region on April 2, 1948 and was subsequently reburied in Nizhny Novgorod, where she and the emperor have a common grave. Three daughters of Nicholas II, besides Olga, had children. N.A. Romanov communicated with I.V. Stalin, and wealth Russian Empire were used to strengthen the power of the USSR...

Truth and lies about the murder of the Royal Family

More than 90 years separate us from July 17, 1918, when the Royal Family (and four faithful who remained with them to the end) were shot in the basement of the Ipatiev house in Yekaterinburg, but doubts and disputes about the circumstances of this brutal murder and even whether everything members of the Royal Family died - these disputes, which began in August 1918 during the first investigation (by the White Army commission), continue to this day...

OFFICIAL VERSION
From approximately the beginning of the 1990s to the present, the official position of the Prosecutor's Office of the Russian Federation is based on the so-called. “Yurovsky’s Note,” which was found and published by Edward Radzinsky for the first time after the opening of the party archives (he himself, as far as I know, never unconditionally asserted that everything in this note by the Chekist-regicide is the absolute truth). In the briefest form, the essence of this note boils down to the following: on the night of July 17, all members of the Royal Family (seven people), Doctor Botkin and three servants were awakened and gathered in the basement of Ipatiev’s house under the pretext of unrest in the city; in the basement the decision of the Urals Council on their execution was read to them (by Yurovsky); immediately after this they were all shot; the execution was complicated by gunpowder smoke that filled the basement - several prisoners had to be finished off with bayonets; after that, all the corpses were taken to the Koptyakovsky forest; some of the bodies were dismembered and, not without difficulty, burned at the stake; the remains were buried. The burial place was also indicated in Yurovsky’s note - approximately there Avdonin and Ryabov found the remains of nine people back in 1979; A government commission in 1994-1998 identified these remains as those of Nicholas, Alexandra, their daughters Olga, Tatiana, Anastasia, Doctor Botkin and three servants of the Royal Family. In the summer of 2007, not far from the same Ganina Yama in the Koptyakovsky forest, 46 small fragments of the bone remains of two more (a boy and a girl) were found - presumably (or allegedly) Alexei and Maria.
Critics of this version and the “Yurovsky Note” point to many contradictory facts and dozens of inconsistencies between this note and the known (from other party archives and publications) recollections of other participants and witnesses of the murder (Ermakov, Strekotin and others). Comparative genetic examinations“old” (found in 1979) remains, carried out in 1994-1998, seemed to confirm their belonging to the Romanov family, but later studies by Japanese and German geneticists gave negative results. In addition, genetic studies from the 1990s are now considered not reliable enough (and are not even accepted in courts). Genetic studies of the “new” remains (found in 2007) are ongoing, but it can already be assumed that they will also not provide sufficiently convincing results and will be disputed.
Finally, the Russian Orthodox Church (ROC) did not recognize the remains buried in 1998 in St. Petersburg as those of members of the Royal Family. At the same time, the Russian Orthodox Church presented 10 questions to the government commission (including, for example, about the absence of a callus from a blow from a Japanese saber on a skull allegedly belonging to Nicholas II), and to this day the Russian Orthodox Church believes that it has not received convincing answers to some of these questions from the Prosecutor’s Office and the government commission of the Russian Federation.
Of course, the author of this article does not take upon himself the courage to answer all the questions and put forward a “final version”, however, I will try to outline the most probable (from my point of view) hypothesis of what actually happened on the night of July 17, 1918 in Ipatiev's house...

PHOTOGRAPHER YUROVSKY AND KODAK CAMERA
Edward Radzinsky also wrote in his book (“Nicholas II. Life and Death”) that Yakov Yurovsky knew photography well and loved to take photographs, so it is strange that he did not take two photographs: of the living Royal Family (at least in in the same basement of Ipatiev’s house) and – second scary photo- the corpses of all family members... Moscow needed both photographs. Lenin needed a photograph of the living Royal Family to misinform the world community, especially since just before the execution (July 16), Lenin assured a correspondent of one of the Danish newspapers that the Royal Family was alive and safe. Yurovsky himself needed photographs of the corpses for his upcoming report on the execution in Moscow...
Evidence was absolutely necessary for Yurovsky to report, if not to Lenin, then certainly to Sverdlov. He could not take the word of either Yurovsky or anyone else.
No jewelry of the Royal Family could be evidence of the death of ALL its members. The Ural Bolsheviks and their leader Sverdlov were known not only as the most brutal Red bandits (since 1905), but also as the toughest bandits in their relations with each other. They trusted absolutely no one, including those among their own people. We can have no doubt that Yurovsky was obliged to present Sverdlov with solid evidence of the murder of all members of the Royal Family - photographs of corpses.
In those days, Yurovsky also had a camera - a German Kodak - the same one that was confiscated from Alexandra Fedorovna during the search on April 17 (30) in Ipatiev’s house. Radzinsky wrote about this with reference to the memoirs of commandant Avdeev (the first commandant of the house). In addition, Radzinsky provided a link to entries in the guard duty book:
“July 11th. A typical family walk. Tatyana and Maria asked for a photographic camera. Of course, the commandant refused them.”
So, the camera was in Ipatiev’s house. The same camera confiscated from the queen when she first entered the Ipatiev House. The camera was lying in the commandant's room of the former photographer Yakov Yurovsky.
Where did this expensive camera go after the shooting? Did Yurovsky take it (and the photographs) with him? - No. Kolchak's investigation found him. According to the book by N.A. Sokolov (“The Murder of the Royal Family”), “burnt metal particles from film reels” were found in the stoves of Ipatiev’s house; in the ovens and garbage at Popov’s house (where the guards lived) “three reels of Kodak films measuring 12 and 1/2 by 10” were found. The Kodak photographic panoramic camera itself (and two boxes with negatives) from Karpov’s store (St. Petersburg) was found in the apartment of security guard M. Lemetin (items 252-254 of N. Sokolov’s inventory). In October 1918, during interrogation, M. Lemetin admitted that he took these (and other) things on July 22 from Ipatiev’s house as things abandoned (by security).
What happened in the basement?
Professional historians often turn up their noses at the mention of the name Radzinsky - in vain! This is snobbery, which does not paint real researchers. Of course, Radzinsky does not write in an academic manner - but no matter how much I double-checked the facts or references he presented, I did not find any major inaccuracies. He - good historian and at the same time a professional playwright, with an excellent instinct for the truth of history. But sometimes he doesn’t say anything...
This is what Edward Radzinsky wrote in his book about a meeting with a certain man (apparently an old security officer), who told him the following:
“I will tell you what was said to the second generation of Soviet intelligence officers in intelligence school... this is 1927-1929. All of them have long been in their graves - and you are unlikely to hear this from anyone except me... So, at the intelligence courses we were told the following: it was necessary to arrange the Family as conveniently as possible for execution. The room (at the top) was narrow - and they were afraid that they would crowd in. And then Yurovsky came up with an idea. He told them that they needed to go to the basement because there was a danger of shelling of the house. In the meantime, the point is that they should be photographed. Because in Moscow they are worried and there are various rumors circulating - that they escaped (indeed, at the end of June there was an alarming telegram about this from Moscow. - E.R.). And so they went down and stood along the shade for a photograph. And when they lined up..."
Further, Radzinsky writes on his own behalf:
“How simple it all turns out to be! Well, of course, he came up with the idea that they were going to photograph the Family. Perhaps he even joked that he was a former photographer. Hence his commands, about which Strekotin writes: “Stand to the left... and you to the right.” And hence the calm submission of everyone characters this scene. And then, when they stood up, waiting for the camera to be brought in...”

So, Radzinsky’s strange guest told him the version that he himself (an old security officer) had heard in the Cheka (NKVD) in the 1920s - they say that the words about the need for photography were used by Yurovsky as a trick to arrange prisoners in the basement without calling their concerns - and Radzinsky allegedly believed in this version.
However, Lenin really needed a photograph of the living Royal Family in Moscow! What really happened in the basement?
Probably, Yurovsky was really preparing to photograph the prisoners, but something prevented him from doing so. What or who? Most likely, the drunken Ermakov (a former convict, and he was really very drunk that night) - this beast somehow insulted Alexandra Fedorovna (she asked to bring chairs to the basement), and it was Ermakov who especially hated her... Probably Nikolai stood up for her... Here and further we can only make assumptions. Probably, a dump, shooting, a terrible bloody massacre began...
Moreover, we can assume that the security officers did not intend to shoot the ENTIRE Tsar’s family (but only Nicholas and Alexei), or that all the prisoners, after being photographed, were going to be taken to the Koptyakovsky forest and shot there.
I think Yurovsky’s actual plan was to take all the prisoners to the Koptyakovsky forest on the night of July 17 (after photographing) and there to hand them over to be torn to pieces by Ermakov’s detachment (25 people). Remember, Mikhail Romanov was killed near Perm in the forest. The prisoners of Alapaevsk were also killed outside the city.
On the eve of the execution, Ermakov promised his “red bandits” to give the tsar’s daughters - of course, they would rape them before killing them. It is known that Ermakov’s detachment was very disappointed and dissatisfied that they saw the prisoners (on the morning of July 17 in the forest) already dead...
...Absolutely all researchers of the execution of the Royal Family (investigators, historians and writers) are confident in the “inappropriate” (or ugly) execution of the execution and absolutely everyone calls it a terrible massacre. Never before or after July 17, 1918 has anyone carried out mass executions (11 prisoners!) in a small closed room. Yurovsky was an experienced security officer, and all members of the firing squad (11 or 12 people) had war experience - didn’t they really know “ simple rules executions?!
The only objection to these arguments may be the following: Yurovsky was afraid that the monarchist conspirators might free the Royal Family on the way to the Koptyakovsky forest - allegedly that is why he decided to shoot the prisoners in the basement of Ipatiev’s house. However, this objection does not stand up to criticism if we remember that - according to the memoirs of Yurovsky himself - all the monarchist conspirators were under the control of the Cheka and the Cheka used them for its own purposes.
Thus, the most likely version of the tragedy of the death of the Royal Family is the version that I outlined above.

THE MORNING AFTER THE EXECUTION
This version is supported by the depressed state known from the recollections of the participants in the execution (the murderers) and witnesses (some were unable to continue killing after the first shots, ran out into the yard and vomited there) and, most importantly, the behavior of Yakov Yurovsky himself. Immediately after the execution, he went to his office and lay there for several hours on the sofa with a cold compress on his head - and this is an “iron and experienced security officer”! Of course, one can refer to the fact that he had never had to kill children before. However, if the decision to shoot ALL members of the Royal Family was made in advance, then the behavior of all participants in the execution still looks very strange. The famous journalist A. Murzin studied in detail all the circumstances of the execution and the hourly chronology of subsequent events on July 17-19, 1918. This is what he established (I quote from one of his articles):
<<Итак, я утверждаю:
First: Yurovsky did not take the corpses to the Koptyakovsky forest. This was done by Ermakov and Medvedev-Kudrin with three assistants - Levatnykh, Kostousov and Partin, as well as with the driver Lyukhanov. Yurovsky, after the corpses were taken away and the blood was washed away in the house and in the yard, he went to his office (to the commandant’s room). This follows from the testimony of the head of the security of the royal family, Pavel Medvedev, who was captured by the whites to the Kolchak investigation.
Then, from the morning until noon on July 17, Yurovsky drove around the city. He was driven by coachman A. Elkin (from M.K. Diterikhs - A. Elkin), who indicated to the white investigation all the addresses where Yurovsky had visited before noon on July 17.... What was Yurovsky doing in the afternoon of July 17? Pyotr Ermakov told me [at a meeting in 1952 - B.R.]: the jewelry (“diamonds”) discovered on the Grand Duchesses “violated all plans for the destruction of the corpses.” In the middle of the day, the entire robber elite of the Bolsheviks - Goloshchekin, Beloborodov, Voikov, Yurovsky - they rushed to mine number 7. Ermakov handed over to them the jewelry (taken from the corpses) “one by one.”>>

So, the loading of corpses (but there were also half-dead victims) onto Lyukhanov’s truck parked in the courtyard of Ipatiev’s house (this happened in the early morning darkness) and their removal to the Koptyakovsky forest, and attempts to destroy the corpses - all this happened from early morning until evening (or until the afternoon) on July 17, under the leadership not of the “iron and reliable” Yurovsky, but of the bandit Ermakov, drunk even before the execution, who probably “added” another glass or two after the execution... In such circumstances, it’s not like two half-dead victims (Alexey and Anastasia) could have disappeared from the truck along the bumpy road to the burial place (as E. Radzinsky suggests), but they (at least Anastasia) could have been carried out from the yard of Ipatiev’s house by sympathizers (and even in love with the Tsar’s daughters) soldiers of the external guard (ordinary workers guys) from Avdeev’s former team - they were not allowed by Yurovsky to join the internal security, but remained in the external security team and were at Ipatiev’s house that night.
Returning to the events of the afternoon of July 17 - I think it is most likely that the ENTIRE top of the Bolsheviks rushed to shaft number 7 not so much because of the discovery of jewelry, but because of the disappearance of two corpses. Only Yurovsky could have accepted the jewelry from Ermakov, but the news of the disappearance of two corpses was truly an emergency! Probably, Ermakov and his people first tried to find the missing bodies (Alexey and Anastasia) on their own, but they could not find them and they were forced to report the disappearance of the bodies to Yurovsky. Yurovsky could not help but report this to his superiors. He himself mentions in his “note” that the situation at the meeting in the Urals Council (in the afternoon of July 17) during his report was very difficult... - Why? If the execution of ALL members of the Royal Family was planned in advance, then why “was the situation very difficult”?
The answer is now almost obvious: firstly, because the execution did not go as planned (and a photograph of the living Royal Family was not taken), and - secondly, even worse - two corpses disappeared! Therefore, Yurovsky did not take a second photograph of the corpses of members of the Royal Family - for the report to Sverdlov...

...Every time I think or write about this topic - about the murder of the Royal Family - I am overcome by a feeling of fatigue, hopelessness and disgust (towards the murderers and Soviet historians too)...
***
...In any history textbook we can read that on the night of July 17, 1918, in the basement of the Ipatiev House in Yekaterinburg, the Royal Family, along with servants and Doctor Botkin, were shot.
However, those historians who study this tragedy in more detail know that for several days after this, rumors circulated in Yekaterinburg that the seriously wounded youngest Tsar’s daughter Anastasia was rescued in the confusion of the night bloodbath by one of the soldiers of the external guard, that she was being hidden where something in the city. It is also known that the “Reds” then searched for the missing Anastasia not only in Yekaterinburg, but throughout Russia.
Famous American writers Greg King and Penny Wilson in their study “The Romanovs. The Fate of the Royal Dynasty” described their impressions from studying this tragedy (pp. 799-801):
“Trying to hide what they did not dare to explain, the Bolsheviks crudely fabricated a highly controversial version of events, which also does not correspond to scientific ideas. They staged a masquerade, shrouded in a lie that snakes and entwines the consciousness with a dead ring of contradictions, offering instead of answers the illusion of truth, which is shared by many. This is the only conclusion that can be reached based on the facts, which inexorably return our thoughts to the fact... that chance [or providence - B.R.] decided the fate of the two young victims... ... Facts are a stubborn thing, and they do not provide any basis believe that Grand Duchess Anastasia or Tsarevich Alexei died that night. Let us finally acknowledge the possibility that one or more of those condemned to death remain alive...”
***
All of the above was written by me in 2008.

Update for January 2010
In general, the situation with the Ekaterinburg remains as of January 2010 remains strange:
1. The new Patriarch of the Russian Orthodox Church (Kirill) has not yet expressed his attitude towards these remains, although it was previously reported that he would familiarize himself with all the materials by May 2009. From other sources of the Russian Orthodox Church (from some hierarchs) there seemed to be statements that the position of the Russian Orthodox Church has not changed: the remains (neither the old ones \reburied in 1998\, nor the new ones \allegedly Alexei and Maria, found in 2007\) are unknown whose.
2. The House of Romanov also does not recognize that these remains belong to the Royal Family.
3. The new (2007) remains were not reburied and continue to remain in the morgue in Yekaterinburg - although Governor E. Rossel back in April 2008. was preparing to solemnly rebury them (in Yekaterinburg) by July 17, 2008
4. The press conference of the senior investigator of the Prosecutor's Office of the Russian Federation V.N. Solovyov on the results of all his work, which he promised to hold back in March 2009, was not held. (after the closure of the Case of the murder of the Royal Family in January 2009).

IT’S EARLY TO END THE ROYAL CASE So says the famous scientist, director of the Institute of History and Archeology of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, VENIAMIN VASILIEVICH ALEXEEV.
http://www.ras.ru/win/db/show_per.asp?P=.id-2208.ln-ru
Let me remind you that V.V. Alekseev was a member of the Government Commission (B. Nemtsov’s Commission) for the identification of Yekaterinburg remains in 1993-1998
(Excerpts from an interview with V.V. Alekseev LG-Ural http://www.romanov-center.narod.ru/)
Quote:
“But where are the documents? These documents are not there.
---Are they not available or are they not available at all? How do you think?
V.V.A. - Today there are none, and we must proceed from this. But I do not rule out that they exist. At the commission meeting I demanded access to the documents of the Cheka of that time. I was told that they were not preserved. ...
I tried to find documents from the Cheka. It’s a paradox - there are no documents from May to December 1818 - neither the Cheka, nor the Cheka, nor the Politburo. I don't know if they were destroyed or hidden."

On the Russian Line website in October-November 2009 there was a discussion on this topic, in which investigator V.N. Solovyov took part:
http://www.rusk.ru/st.php?idar=105864 (these materials were removed in December 2009)
On November 5, 2009, in one of his comments, Solovyov, in particular, wrote the following about the archives of the Ural Regional Council and the Ural Cheka of that time:
Quote:
“As for the archives of the Ural Regional Council and the Ural Cheka, today it is impossible to say with complete certainty whether they have been preserved or not. All attempts to find them, and these attempts were made back in the 1920s, were unsuccessful. My conscience is calm; I made serious efforts to their search."

Marvelous! What's surprising is this:
1. There is no doubt that these archives were calmly removed from Yekaterinburg between July 17 and July 25, 1918. After all, it is known that trains calmly left Yekaterinburg in those days, and Ya. Yurovsky himself calmly left for Moscow with a lot of luggage (jewels of the Royal Family and documents) a few days after the murder of the Royal Family. The Bolsheviks and security officers of the Urals had 7-8 days to calmly transport all their archives to Moscow.
2. It is known how kindly the communists, and especially the security officers, were (and still are) towards their archives. Are the archives of the Ural Regional Council and the Ural Cheka lost in Moscow?! As Stanislavsky said, I don’t believe it!
Hence the conclusions:
1. These archives were so classified from the very beginning that they are still inaccessible even to the senior investigator of the General Prosecutor's Office of the Russian Federation (!), or these archives were destroyed by the Bolsheviks themselves (Chekists) after their arrival in Moscow - once already in 1920- s they allegedly disappeared.
2. These archives contained information that was so divergent from the official version set out in the so-called. “Notes of Yurovsky” (created in the 1920s together with the main party historian of the Bolsheviks, Pokrovsky, and, undoubtedly, under the control of the security officers), that the security officers considered it necessary to destroy these archives at the same time.
However, it is more likely that these archives were simply “tightly” classified by the security officers from the early 1920s until now.

Boris Romanov
Saint Petersburg

Licensed DVD with documentary film“The Emperor Who Knew His Fate” can be ordered online at the Bukvoed store:
http://www.bookvoed.ru/item861527.html

Interesting materials You can read about this topic and the fate of the rescued youngest Tsar’s daughter Anastasia on the page of Yekaterinburg researcher Vladimir Momot:

P.P.S. I am publishing below excerpts from a letter from Vyacheslav Leonidovich POPOV (Honored Scientist of the Russian Federation, Professor, Doctor of Medical Sciences) to the Hierarchy of the Russian Orthodox Church, published on the Russian Line website on October 15, 2007.
(http://rusk.ru/st.php?idar=105031):

<<С 1991 года я входил в состав экспертной комиссии по исследованию екатеринбургских останков и непосредственно работал с ними. Нам удалось доказать родственную (соматогенетическую) связь четырех женщин из захоронения и реконструировать обстоятельства расстрела в Ипатьевском доме.
From the very beginning, we drew attention to the fact that the investigation is one-sided and superficial, aimed at proving a single version - the royal family was shot in the Ipatiev house, the remains found near Yekaterinburg belong to the royal family. We have repeatedly told investigators about this and stated this in the press.
Nevertheless, in 1998, the burial of Yekaterinburg remains took place in the Peter and Paul Cathedral under the guise of royal ones. However, doubts remain and are currently multiplying. What are these doubts and questions?

1. There is a significant unresolved contradiction in the materials of the criminal case. From the protocol of the inspection of the scene of the incident dated July 11-13, 1991, it follows that the dimensions of the burial are 1.5 x 2.1 meters, the remains lie in two tiers. From the explanations of A.N. Avdonin and G.T. Ryabov, also available in the case, it follows that in 1979, both of these citizens removed three skulls from the burial, while they limited themselves to an excavation measuring 0.5x0.5 meters in the northeastern corner of the burial. When analyzing the objectively recorded location of the bone remains in the burial, it follows that two of the three skulls that Avdonin and Ryabov extracted in 1979 could not technically be removed from the clay soil, since they were located at a distance of about 1-1.5 meters from the edge of the excavation , made in 1979 by Avdonin and Ryabov. Ryabov, during hearings in the State Duma, in the presence of investigator Solovyov, was asked to explain this contradiction. Ryabov did not give an explanation, and Solovyov did not try to eliminate them. Questions inevitably arise: were the skulls removed from the burial in 1979? Maybe the skulls were not removed in 1979, but were placed in a burial place in 1980, when Avdonin and Ryabov “worked” in the burial place again? Maybe Ryabov and Avdonin did the excavation in 1979 differently from what they described in their explanations to the prosecutor in 1991?

2. In 1993-1994. It became known about the report of three doctors who assisted Nikolai Alexandrovich (then heir to the throne) in 1891 immediately after he received three blows to the head with a saber in Japan. The doctors' report spoke of a 2.5 cm long piece of bone removed from one wound. In 1995, skull 4, subsequently recognized by a government commission as the skull of Nicholas II, was subjected to a thorough computed tomography study. No traces of fracture healing were found at the wound site. At first glance, this suggests that the skull does not belong to Nicholas II, however, the investigation draws a conclusion that allows for this possibility.

3. We have established that the two teeth found among the remains cannot belong to any of the nine skeletons found in the burial. Since this did not fit into the main version of the investigation, another group of experts was selected. Without any morphological evidence, they stated that the two teeth belonged to a person aged 15-21 years. They then stated verbatim the following:
a) in terms of size and rare morphological characteristics, these teeth belong to Anastasia Nikolaevna,
b) based on the same characteristics, the teeth cannot belong to Alexey Nikolaevich.
These two conclusions cannot be considered any, even the slightest bit of evidence, since for this you need to know what “sizes and rare morphological features” Anastasia Nikolaevna and Alexey Nikolaevich had. There is no such information! In any case, today they are unknown to anyone. Unfortunately, the investigator ignored this obvious nonsense.

4. As evidence that the remains belonged to the royal family, a photo alignment was performed. In a number of cases it was, to put it mildly, imperfect. Sometimes (in the case of Alexandra Feodorovna) in order to “achieve the desired effect,” experts resorted to distorting the primary state of the object (the skull). The significance of this method is evidenced by the fact that two different specialists (Abramov and Kislis) came to mathematically sound, but diametrically opposed conclusions: one of them believes that skull.4 from the Yekaterinburg burial belongs to Nicholas II, and the other believes that Nicholas II - this is one of the residents of Sukhumi - Berezkin.

5. The sculptural reconstruction of the heads of members of the royal family cannot be criticized. Such a reconstruction has evidentiary legal significance only if the “sculptor” has never seen lifetime images of the faces of the people whose sculptural portraits he makes.

6. The greatest controversy today is over the genetic identification of the remains:
a) Although official genetic studies were carried out by different specialists in England and the USA, the conclusion was signed only by the Russian geneticist P. Ivanov. This requires explanation.
b) Geneticist P. Ivanov tried to establish the genetic characteristics of the teenager’s controversial tooth (see paragraph 3) and a fragment of a scarf soaked in the blood of the heir Nikolai Alexandrovich after being wounded in 1891. He was unable to determine either the genetic parameters of these objects or their gender, although he had a fairly significant amount of material (one of the photographs published in the Japanese press shows how P. Ivanov cuts a strip of fabric from a scarf about 1.5-2 cm and about 30 cm long). This requires explanation.
c) Russian geneticist L. Zhivotovsky in the journal "Annals of Human Biology", volume 21, . 6, p. 569-577, published a critical note in 1999 about shortcomings in official genetic testing. There were no responses to this criticism.
d) In 1999 in the journal "Medicine and Biology", volume 139, . 6, for December 10, and subsequently at international conferences of geneticists in Münster (Germany) in 2001, Melbourne (Australia) in 2001 and at the international congress of forensic experts in St. Petersburg in 2004, Japanese professor T. Nagai and co-authors published the results of a study of hair from the head of Nicholas II’s brother Georgy Alexandrovich, his nail plates, a print from a sweat stain on Nicholas II’s vest and the blood of Tikhon Nikolaevich Kulikovsky-Romanov. The results obtained do not coincide with the data of the official genetic examination carried out with the participation of P. Ivanov.
e) In 2004, the American geneticist Knight and his co-authors published in the journal “Annals of Human Biology” the results of a genetic study of the remains of Elizabeth Feodorovna, the sister of Empress Alexandra Feodorovna. Knight's results contradict the results obtained during the official genetic examination with the participation of P. Ivanov.
f) In 2003-2004. Ekaterinburg population geneticists found that a peculiar mutation, similar to the one discovered by geneticists (with the participation of P. Ivanov) in the USA, is quite common in the Ural population.

All this suggests that, regardless of the reasons for the contradictions, the results of genetic research in no case can be taken as absolutes, and that they initially need careful and repeated verification. In any case, the results of official genetic research (with the participation of P. Ivanov) in no case can have independent evidentiary value in classifying the Ekaterinburg remains as royal ones.

7. The analysis of investigator Solovyov’s answers to 10 questions of the Church, published in the famous book “Repentance” can be considered as an unsubstantiated and to some extent dismissive reply, in fact, not containing answers on the substance of the questions posed.

Before the remains were buried in 1998, bone fragments from all nine skeletons were removed and left behind. Apparently the time has come to turn to these fragments and conduct a genetic study of them. However, to be confident in the objectivity, reliability and correct interpretation of the results, in my humble opinion, the church should delegate its trusted specialists to the relevant expert commission.

Vyacheslav Leonidovich POPOV, Honored Scientist of the Russian Federation, Professor, Doctor of Medical Sciences>>
http://rusk.ru/st.php?idar=105031

In the book of academician V.V. Alekseeva and G.N. Shumkin “Who are you, Mrs. Tchaikovskaya” (Ekaterinburg, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2014), the authors examined new documents and archives, as well as new (not previously translated into Russian) foreign sources, which claim that the Tsar’s daughters and the Empress were not executed 17 July 1918, and were taken (at different times) abroad:

<<В середине 1970-х годов к этой проблеме обратились британские журналисты А. Саммерс и Т. Мангольд. По их собственным словам, находясь «между историей и журналистикой», они с помощью спецслужб сумели вычленить из новых документов не известную ранее информацию, которая свидетельствовала о том, что не все Романовы были уничтожены в доме Ипатьева. В частности, авторитетные дешифровщики доказали, что телеграмма об уничтожении всей семьи, отправленная с екатеринбургского почтамта Белобородовым, не соответствует действительности. «Царь умер один – его семьи с ним не было», – утверждают они. [Саммерс А., Мангольд Т. Дело Романовых, или Расстрел, которого не было (1976 -англ., 2011 -русск.). М., 2011. С. 290-305.]
The Summers-Mangold line was continued by the French professor of history Marc Ferro, who in the book “Nicholas II” (1990 - French, 1991 - Russian) provides a large amount of contradictory evidence about the possibility of preserving the female part of the emperor’s family and transporting it first to the European part of the country, and then abroad. Most recently, he published a new book, The Truth about the Romanov Tragedy. With documents found in the Vatican archives, he confirms his assumption, made 20 years ago, that the wife of Nicholas II and their daughters were saved thanks to a secret treaty concluded between the Bolsheviks and the Germans. M. Ferro believes that after the murder of the German Ambassador Mirbach by the Left Socialist Revolutionaries, Chancellor Wilhelm II had the opportunity to violate the Brest Peace Treaty, which would lead to the death of the Soviet regime. The Soviets had to make concessions to the Germans and leave the wife of Nicholas II alive, as well as their daughters. To save face in front of the revolutionary masses, the Bolsheviks reported that women suffered the same fate as the Tsar.
In July 2013, in an interview in connection with the release of his new book, M. Ferro provided sensational data. Based on previously unpublished documents, he reported that negotiations regarding the transfer of the Tsarina and her daughters to the Germans were conducted on the Soviet side by Chicherin, Radek, Ioffe, and on the German side by Kuhkman and Rietzler. After the transfer, Grand Duchess Olga Nikolaevna was protected by the Vatican, received a pension from the former Kaiser of Germany Wilhelm II as his goddaughter until the latter's death in 1941 in Holland, and she later died in Italy. Grand Duchess Maria married one of the former Ukrainian princes. The Vatican granted Empress Alexandra Feodorovna asylum in Poland in a convent in Lemberg (Lvov), where she lived with her daughter Tatiana. Mark Ferro concludes this part of his interview with the words: “It is now definitely established that they were not executed, unlike their father Nicholas II.” Then how should we feel about the decision of the government commission to identify the alleged remains to rebury all family members in the Peter and Paul Cathedral of St. Petersburg?
The fate of the Tsar's youngest daughter Anastasia, against the backdrop of the vicissitudes that befell the female part of the Romanov family, looks even more mysterious. According to a number of authors, the Grand Duchess was taken from Yekaterinburg by the guard of the Ipatiev house, Alexander Tchaikovsky, taken to the western border of Russia, then transported to Romania, where she lived under the name of Mrs. Tchaikovskaya, and gave birth to a son from him. Then, fearing Bolshevik persecution, she moved to Germany, where she was initially recognized by her mother’s relatives. However, after she began to talk about the visit of the Tsarina’s brother Ernest to Russia (1916), which hinted at negotiations for a separate peace with Germany, she was considered an impostor and abandoned.>>

A new turn in the investigation into the murder of the Royal Family (and the identification of the so-called Yekaterinburg remains) occurred in December 2015. Important additional examinations (including genetic) and a full historical examination (which has not previously been carried out) will be carried out. See more details.