Examples of complex sentence diagrams. Parsing a simple sentence

Examples of complex sentence diagrams. Parsing a simple sentence
Examples of complex sentence diagrams. Parsing a simple sentence
14.10.2019
  1. Characterize the sentence according to the purpose of the statement: narrative, interrogative or motivating.
  2. By emotional coloring: exclamation or non-exclamation.
  3. Based on the presence of grammatical basics: simple or complex.
  4. Then, depending on whether the sentence is simple or complex:
If simple:

5. Characterize the sentence by the presence of the main members of the sentence: two-part or one-part, indicate which is the main member of the sentence if it is one-part (subject or predicate).

6. Characterize by the presence of minor members of the sentence: common or non-widespread.

7. Indicate whether the sentence is complicated in any way ( homogeneous members, appeal, introductory words) or not complicated.

8. Underline all parts of the sentence, indicate parts of speech.

9. Create a proposal outline, indicating grammatical basis and complication, if any.

 If it's complicated:

5. Indicate what kind of connection is in the sentence: union or non-union.

6. Indicate what is the means of communication in a sentence: intonation, coordinating conjunctions or subordinating conjunctions.

7. Conclude what kind of sentence it is: non-union (BSP), complex (SSP), complex (SPP).

8. Disassemble each part complex sentence, as simple, starting from point No. 5 of the adjacent column.

9. Underline all parts of the sentence, indicate parts of speech.

10. Draw up a sentence outline, indicating the grammatical basis and complication, if any.

Example of parsing a simple sentence

Oral analysis:

Declarative sentence, non-exclamatory, simple, two-part, grammatical basis: pupils and female students studying, common, complicated by homogeneous subjects.

Writing:

Declarative, non-exclamatory, simple, two-part, grammatical basis pupils and female students studying, common, complicated by homogeneous subjects.

An example of parsing a complex sentence

Oral analysis:

Declarative sentence, non-exclamatory, complex, conjunction, means of communication subordinating conjunction because, complex sentence. The first simple sentence: one-part, with the main member - the predicate didn't ask common, not complicated. Second simple sentence: two-part, grammatical basis my class and I went common, not complicated.

Writing:

Declarative, non-exclamatory, complex, conjunction, means of communication subordinating conjunction because, SPP.

1st PP: one-part, with the main member – predicate didn't ask common, not complicated.

2nd PP: two-part, grammatical basis - my class and I went widespread, not complicated.

Example of a diagram (sentence followed by a diagram)


Another parsing option

Parsing. Order in parsing.

In phrases:

  1. Select the required phrase from the sentence.
  2. We look at the structure - highlight the main word and the dependent word. We indicate which part of speech is the main and dependent word. Next, we indicate in what syntactic way this phrase is connected.
  3. And finally, we indicate what its grammatical meaning is.

In a simple sentence:

  1. We determine what the sentence is based on the purpose of the statement - narrative, incentive or interrogative.
  2. We find the basis of the sentence, establish that the sentence is simple.
  3. Next, you need to talk about how this proposal is constructed.
    • Is it two-part or one-part. If it is one-part, then determine the type: personal, impersonal, nominal or indefinitely personal.
    • Common or not common
    • Incomplete or complete. If the sentence is incomplete, then it is necessary to indicate which member of the sentence is missing.
  4. If this sentence is complicated in any way, be it homogeneous members or separate members of the proposal, this must be noted.
  5. Next you need to analyze the sentence by members, indicating what parts of speech they are. It is important to follow the parsing order. First, the predicate and subject are determined, then the secondary ones, which are included first in the subject, then in the predicate.
  6. We explain why punctuation marks are placed in the sentence one way or another.

Predicate

  1. We note whether the predicate is a simple verb or a compound (nominal or verbal).
  2. Indicate how the predicate is expressed:
    • simple - what form of the verb;
    • compound verb - what it consists of;
    • compound nominal - what copula is used, how the nominal part is expressed.

In a sentence that has homogeneous members.

If we have a simple sentence before us, then when analyzing it we need to note what kind of homogeneous members of the sentence they are and how they are related to each other. Either through intonation, or through intonation with conjunctions.

In sentences with isolated members:

If we have a simple sentence before us, then when analyzing it, we need to note what the turnover will be. Next, we analyze the words that are included in this circulation according to the members of the sentence.

In sentences with isolated parts of speech:

First, we note that in this sentence there is direct speech. We indicate the direct speech and text of the author. We analyze and explain why punctuation marks are placed in the sentence this way and not otherwise. We draw a proposal diagram.

In a compound sentence:

First, we indicate which sentence according to the purpose of the statement is interrogative, declarative or motivating. We find simple sentences in the sentence and highlight the grammatical basis in them.

We find conjunctions that connect simple sentences into complex ones. We note what kind of conjunctions they are - adversative, connecting or disjunctive. We determine the meaning of this entire complex sentence - opposition, alternation or enumeration. We explain why the punctuation marks are placed in this way in the sentence. Then each simple sentence that makes up a complex sentence must be parsed in the same way as a simple sentence is parsed.

In a complex sentence with a subordinate clause (one)

First, we indicate what the sentence is according to the purpose of the statement. We highlight the grammatical basis of all simple sentences that make up a complex sentence. Let's read them out.

We name which sentence is the main one and which is the subordinate one. We explain exactly how complex sentence it is, we pay attention to how it is constructed, how the subordinate clause is connected to the main clause and what it refers to.

We explain why punctuation marks are placed in this way in this sentence. Then, the subordinate and main clauses must be parsed in the same way as simple sentences are parsed.

In a complex sentence with subordinate clauses (several)

We call what a sentence is according to the purpose of the statement. We highlight the grammatical basis of all simple sentences that make up a complex sentence and read them out. We indicate which sentence is the main one and which is the subordinate clause. It is necessary to indicate what the subordination in the sentence is - either it is parallel subordination, or sequential, or homogeneous. If there is a combination of several types of subordination, this must be noted. We explain why punctuation marks are placed in this way in the sentence. And, at the end, we analyze the subordinate and main clauses as simple sentences.

In a complex non-union sentence:

We call what a sentence is according to the purpose of the statement. We find the grammatical basis of all the simple sentences that make up this complex sentence. We read them out and name the number of simple sentences that make up a complex sentence. We determine the meaning of the relationships between simple sentences. It can be sequence, cause and effect, opposition, simultaneity, explanation or addition.

We note what the structural features of this sentence are, what kind of complex sentence it is. How are the primes connected in this sentence and what do they refer to.

We explain why the punctuation marks are placed in this way in the sentence.

In a complex sentence in which there are different types of connections.

We call what purpose the sentence is in terms of the purpose of the statement. We find and highlight the grammatical basis of all simple sentences that make up a complex sentence, and read them out. We establish that this proposal will be a proposal in which different types of communication are present. Why? We determine what connections are present in this sentence - conjunctional coordinating, subordinating or any others.

By meaning, we establish how simple ones are formed in a complex sentence. We explain why punctuation marks are placed in the sentence in this way. We parse all the simple sentences from which a complex sentence is composed in the same way as a simple sentence.

Everything for studying » Russian language » Parsing sentences

To bookmark a page, press Ctrl+D.


Link: https://site/russkij-yazyk/sintaksicheskij-razbor

This article will talk about how to correctly create a proposal outline. Who needs it? Everyone without exception. If short posts or comments in in social networks and instant messengers, you can write without knowing the Russian language (which is what many people are into), but when writing articles for your own blogs, you must be guided by these rules. After all, it is much more pleasant and understandable for users visiting your websites and blogs to read competent speech that attracts attention and keeps them on the page. And, of course, correct preparation of proposals is very important for people holding senior public or commercial positions - literacy increases trust on the part of visitors, partners and clients. And in order for sentences to sound correct and beautiful, they must be composed according to certain patterns. Also this material will help schoolchildren and students prepare for exams or complete homework assignments.

Action Plan for Proposal Outlining

In order to correctly compose a sentence diagram, you must follow a certain algorithm of actions:

  • Carefully consider the written proposal;
  • Determine what type it belongs to by the intonation and purpose of the statement;
  • Find the basis main idea sentences carrying important information(subject and predicate);

Simple and complex sentences
  • By the number of stems, determine whether the sentence is simple (with one stem) or complex (with two or more stems);

How to determine the number of parts in a complex sentence
  • Use perpendicular lines to separate the boundaries of simple sentences (you can also highlight participial/ participial phrases and other complications);
  • Underline the parts of the sentence with appropriate lines;

Symbols of sentence members
  • Determine the presence and nature of the conjunction between fragments of a complex sentence (subordinating or coordinating) - in the case correct definition you will understand what type of proposal you are dealing with;
  • Place simple sentences in rectangular brackets, since they are equivalent fragments of compound or non-conjunctive compounds;

Rectangular brackets to indicate simple and complex sentences
  • Place subordinate clauses included in the complex structure in parentheses;

Parentheses to indicate subordinate clauses
  • Carefully study the complex sentence and put a question from the word in the main fragment (over which draw a cross) to the subordinate clause; Draw an arrow from this word to the subordinate clause and write a question above it.

Parsing a simple sentence

All the information collected during the study process makes it possible to correctly draw up a proposal outline. After completing all of the above steps, the moment comes when you can start drawing the diagram itself. Write down from your sentence in order all the signs that were used to distinguish simple sentences, highlight phrases (adverbial and participial), grammatical basics, questions and arrows to the subordinate clause from the main one, and other complications. Collect all this data in a line graph. When it is necessary to parse a complex sentence that has several subordinate clauses, then to correctly display the subordination, a vertical graphic diagram is also necessary (it will be discussed below). The numbers indicate the degrees of subordinate clauses - by them you can determine their place in the composition of sentences, while the main thing does not have any designations.

If you are a schoolchild or student, you may encounter a situation where teachers require you to mark the secondary clauses along with the main clauses on the diagram. It is also possible that a new proposal must be drawn up according to the proposed scheme. If you approach the matter carefully, these actions will not hinder you.

Making a plan for a simple proposal

We need to put together a simple sentence diagram. Let's not go far, let's take an example from primary classes:


Simple sentence diagram

This sentence is two-part - it has two main members. There are also one-part sentences in which the main member is only one of the two. If a sentence does not have minor members, then it is not widespread (“Poems were born”), but if it does, then it is widespread (as presented above). Also, sentences have incomplete or full view(depending on which configuration contains the necessary members - reduced or full). Avoid mistakes with predicates when drawing up a graphic sentence diagram:

  • compound nominal predicates – Danielwill be an athlete;
  • simple – Danielswam;
  • compound verbs – Danielwanted to swim.

Simple sentence with homogeneous members

Homogeneous members on graphic diagram are displayed using circles. These circles indicate their role in the syntax of a sentence: definitions, predicates, etc.


The circles reflect the roles of homogeneous members of the sentence

With introductory words or appeal

Introductory words are indicated by the letters “ВВ”, separated from the rest of the parts in the diagram by two vertical lines and necessarily by the punctuation marks that surround them in the sentence.


Introductory words in a sentence

The same rules apply to addresses as to introductory words, only “O” are used instead of the letters “BB”.


Appeal in a proposal

With adverbial or participial phrases

To highlight phrases that include gerunds (DO) or participles (PO), the diagram uses the same punctuation marks as to delimit them in a sentence.


Participial phrase in the diagram

How to create a sentence diagram with direct speech

In the diagram, direct speech is highlighted as follows:

  • the boundaries of the proposal are highlighted;
  • the letter “A” is used to denote author’s words, and “P” is used for direct speech;
  • punctuation marks are added.

Direct speech in a sentence

How to outline a complex sentence

Fragments of a complex non-conjunctive and complex sentence are in an equal position, therefore rectangular brackets are used to designate them.


Complex sentence on the diagram
Non-union complex sentence on a graphic diagram

Rectangular brackets are used to indicate the main part in a complex sentence, and round brackets are used to indicate a subordinate clause. Moreover, the subordinate clause can appear anywhere: at the back, at the beginning, and even in the middle of the main clause.


Rectangular brackets are for main clauses, round brackets are for subordinate clauses

Before you plan your proposal, raw material must be carefully studied to avoid difficulties with different types of communication. It happens that such sentences contain an important idea that is easy to lose when trying to simplify the text and rearrange parts.

How to create a complex sentence diagram with multiple clauses

In order to correctly display sentences that have several subordinate clauses, a vertical diagram is used:

“We learned that a hurricane was coming that could destroy everything on the coast.” ( consistent submission):

[…],

↓what?

(What …)

↓which one?

(which …).

“When we were already approaching the city, Daniil squinted to get a better look at the surroundings.” (parallel submission):

[…],

↓when? ↓why?

(when...), (to...).

“We are very glad that you came, that you are with us today, that you like it here.” ( homogeneous subordination):

[…],

↓what? ↓what? ↓what?

(what...), (what...), (what...).

The main purpose of this article is to help you remember school rules for the Russian language and remind you of the main points, observing which you can easily construct a diagram of any sentence.

When working with various texts, many people need to parse a sentence according to its composition. Carrying out such analysis usually presupposes that a person has appropriate philological knowledge that can help in the correct analysis of the text he needs. At the same time, there are also services on the network that perform online sentence parsing operations. After thoroughly studying the rules for parsing different offers Regarding the composition, I decided to present all my achievements in this article.

At the beginning, I note that the expression “parsing a sentence by composition” is somewhat incorrect, since words are usually parsed by composition, and what interests us in in this case, is called “sentence parsing”.

In this case, the specified syntactic parsing (at school it is also called “parsing by members”) is usually performed as follows:

  • Decide which sentence you are analyzing based on the purpose of its statement (declarative, interrogative or motivating in nature);
  • Indicate the emotional coloring of the sentence (is it exclamatory or non-exclamatory);
  • Note the number of grammatical stems in this sentence (if the sentence is simple, then one stem, if complex, then two or more);

If the sentence is simple:


Example of a simple sentence:

“It was an extraordinary autumn day!”

Having carried out a syntactic analysis, we can see that this sentence is declarative, exclamatory, simple, two-part, complete, and not complicated.

If the sentence is complex:

  • Decide on the connection in a complex sentence - union or non-union;
  • Indicate the connection used in the sentence - intonation, subordinating, coordinating;
  • Indicate the type of complex sentence - non-conjunctive, complex, complex.

Example of a complex sentence:

“The bouquet included roses and lilies, but she liked tulips better.”

Having carried out a syntactic analysis of this sentence, we can see that this sentence has narrative character, non-exclamatory, complex, possesses allied communications, compound. The first sentence here is two-part, the grammatical basis is the words “there were roses and lilies”, it is common, and is complicated by homogeneous subjects.

The second sentence in this complex sentence is two-part, its grammatical basis is the words “liked tulips”, the sentence is common and not complicated.

Services for analyzing proposals by composition online

Due to wealth grammatical structures, and the difficulty of creating a powerful network tool for parsing text, the services presented on the network (of which there are few) have rather weak capabilities for conducting full parsing of sentences. However, I would highlight the following resources:

Seosin.ru

Among Russian-language resources for semantic analysis online (de facto they are practically not represented) I would highlight the seosin.ru service. It allows you to identify syntactic and morphological errors, demonstrates the general associativity of the text, and performs other types of analysis. Unfortunately, the service does not always work stably; dysfunctions are often observed in its operation.

  1. To work with this service, go to seosin.ru.
  2. Enter your proposal in the appropriate window and click on “Analyze”.

Lexisrex.com

For lovers in English The powerful linguistic resource lexisrex.com can help with parsing. Its capabilities make it possible to analyze a proposal by its members. However, this site also has other auxiliary tools to implement various types linguistic analysis online.

  1. To use this resource, log in to lexisrex.com.
  2. Paste your proposal into the appropriate window and click on the “Analyze” button.

Linguist forums

When parsing sentences online, you can turn to the help of the “human factor” and go to various linguist forums (level gramota.turbotext.ru, rusforus.ru and analogues). Register there, ask your question, and they will definitely help you.

Conclusion

Network resources that allow you to analyze proposals by composition are rather scarce, which is associated with the difficulties of creating such resources. However, there are several such tools online (most of them are in English) that make it easy to carry out the text analysis we need. Use the functionality of these services to parse the necessary sentences and conduct parsing online.

In contact with

When parsing a sentence syntactically, the construction of a sentence diagram is assumed.

All three educational complexes use linear diagrams, in which parts of a compound, non-union proposal and the main parts of a complex sentence are indicated by square brackets, and the subordinate parts of the SPP by round brackets. At the same time, in each part, underscores indicate the subject and predicate, means of communication are introduced into the schematic representation of the subordinate part, and a question is raised from the main part to the subordinate part; In linear diagrams, it is customary to place punctuation marks between parts of a complex sentence.

As workers in all educational complexes a type of linear diagram is used in which the presence of complicating members in a sentence is symbolically displayed, but in the final analysis of the sentence these designations are no longer used.

As already mentioned, they are more visual for demonstrating the connection of parts in a complex sentence hierarchical (vertical) schemes. Their construction is provided for by complexes 2 and 3 along with linear ones and the new textbook of complex 1. In complex 2, the same ones are used for the hierarchical scheme symbols, as for linear, but subordinate clauses of the first degree are placed under the main ones, subordinate clauses of the second degree - under subordinate clauses of the first degree, etc.; these schemes could be called linear-hierarchical Complex 3 uses hierarchical schemes, similar topics that are presented in our description. Let us give as an example a linear and two hierarchical schemes of the same sentence:

I regretted 1 , what am I not an artist 2 , which can display all the charm of this spring morning 3.

Linear diagram:

The hierarchical scheme adopted in the new complex textbook and in complex 3:

The new textbook of complex 1 also offers an unconventional type of hierarchical schemes used in cases where the subordinate clause breaks the main one:

The path that led us to the lake suddenly ended.

,

In complex 3, circles and ovals are used to indicate subordinate clauses instead of rectangles.

In practice pre-university training It is customary to use hierarchical schemes.

There are methods for constructing diagrams in which conjunctions that are not members of the sentence are placed outside the rectangle (circle) of the subordinate clause, and allied words, as members of the sentence, are placed inside the schematic representation of the parts.

So, the proposal diagram:

I regretted 1 , What I'm not an artist 2 , which can display all the beauty of this spring morning 3 .

in this case it will look like this:

When constructing a hierarchical diagram, parts connected by any type of syntactic connection (coordinating, subordinating, non-conjunctive) are connected by lines.

Punctuation marks can be added to hierarchical schemes ( new textbook complex I, complex 2) or not added (complex 3).

It is advisable to perform syntactic analysis of a complex sentence according to the following scheme:

I. Analyze the proposal by members.

II. Divide the sentence into parts, number the parts in order.

III. Draw up a sentence diagram indicating means of communication and types of subordinate clauses.

IV. Describe the relationships between subordinate clauses: sequential, parallel, homogeneous subordination.

V. Make a descriptive analysis according to the following scheme:

1. According to the purpose of the statement:

Narrative;

Interrogative;

Incentive.

2. By intonation:

Non-exclamatory;

Exclamation.

3. By the number of grammatical bases:

1) simple;

2) complex:

Compound,

complex,

Non-Union,

WITH different types communications.

4. By the presence of one or both main members:

1) two-part;

2) one-piece. With the main member:

a) subject - nominative;

b) predicate:

Definitely personal

Vaguely personal, (- generalized personal),

Impersonal.

5. By the presence of minor members:

Common;

Undistributed.

6. By the presence of missing members:

Incomplete (indicate which member(s) of the sentence is/are missing).

7. According to the presence of complicating members: 1) uncomplicated;

2) complicated:

Homogeneous members of the sentence (specify which ones),

Separate secondary members of the sentence - definitions (including appendices), additions, circumstances (expressed by participial, participial, comparative and other phrases),

Introductory words, introductory and plug-in structures,

Direct speech,

Appeal.

When a sentence is complicated by direct speech or an inserted sentence, they are considered and described as an independent sentence.

Sample parsing a complex sentence:


The sentence is narrative, non-exclamatory, complex, with different types of connections.

Part 1: two-part (subject cabinet, predicate was, PGS), widespread, complete, complicated by similar circumstances;

Part 2: two-part (subject dampness, predicate was,

Part 3: one-part - indefinite-personal (predicate opened b, PGS), widespread, complete, uncomplicated;

Part 4: one-part - impersonal (predicate it was impossible to say) non-extensive, complete, uncomplicated (another version of parsing: two-part, incomplete - the place of the subject is occupied by an explanatory clause, non-extensive, uncomplicated);

Part 5: two-part (subject spruce, predicate ends PGS), widespread, complete, uncomplicated;

Part 6: two-part (subject spruce, omitted, predicate begins PGS), widespread, incomplete (subject omitted), uncomplicated;

Part 7: two-part (subject boy, predicate standing, PGS), widespread, complete, uncomplicated;

Part 8: two-part (subject volumes, predicate were, PGS, omitted), common, incomplete (predicate omitted), uncomplicated.

2__3__4__5 - sequential submission,

2__3__4 - 6 - sequential submission,

2 - 7 - parallel submission,

5 - 6 - homogeneous submission.


Related information.


Syntactic analysis of a simple sentence has become firmly established in the practice of elementary and high school. This is the most difficult and voluminous type of grammatical analysis. It includes the characteristics and outline of the sentence, analysis by members indicating parts of speech.

The structure and meaning of a simple sentence is studied starting from the 5th grade. The full set of features of a simple sentence is indicated in the 8th grade, and in the 9th grade the focus is on complex sentences.

In this type of analysis, the levels of morphology and syntax are correlated: the student must be able to identify parts of speech, recognize their forms, find conjunctions, understand how words are connected in a phrase, know the signs of the main and minor members of a sentence.

Let's start with the simplest thing: we will help the children prepare for parsing in 5th grade. In elementary school, the student remembers the sequence of parsing and performs it at an elementary level, indicating the grammatical basis, syntactic connections between words, the type of sentence according to the composition and purpose of the statement, learns to draw up diagrams and find homogeneous members.

In elementary schools, different Russian language programs are used, so the level of requirements and student preparation are different. In the fifth grade, I took in children who studied in elementary school according to programs educational system"School 2100", "School of Russia" and "Primary School of the 21st Century". There are big differences. Teachers primary school They do a tremendous amount of work to compensate for the shortcomings of their textbooks, and they themselves “create” continuity between primary and secondary schools.

In grade 5, the material on sentence analysis is generalized, expanded and built into a more complete form; in grades 6-7 it is improved taking into account newly studied morphological units (verb forms: participle and gerund; adverb and state category; function words: prepositions, conjunctions and particles ).

Let us show with examples the differences between the level of requirements in the parsing format.

In 4th grade

In 5th grade

In a simple sentence, the grammatical basis is highlighted, familiar parts of speech are indicated above the words, homogeneous members are emphasized, phrases are written out, or syntactic connections between words are drawn. Scheme: [O -, O]. Declarative, non-exclamatory, simple, common, with homogeneous predicates.

Noun (main word) + adj.,

Ch. (main word) + noun.

Ch. (main word) + place.

Adverb + verb (main word)

Syntactic connections are not drawn, phrases are not written out, the scheme and basic notations are the same, but the characteristics are different: narrative, non-exclamatory, simple, two-part, common, complicated by homogeneous predicates.

Analysis is constantly practiced in lessons and participates in grammatical tasks in control dictations.

In a complex sentence, the grammatical basics are emphasized, the parts are numbered, familiar parts of speech are signed over the words, the type is indicated according to the purpose of the statement and emotional coloring, according to the composition and presence of minor members. Parsing scheme: [O and O] 1, 2, and 3. Narrative, non-exclamatory, complex, widespread.

The scheme remains the same, but the characteristics are different: narrative, non-exclamatory, complex, consists of 3 parts that are connected by a non-union and union connection, 1 part has homogeneous members, all parts are two-part and widespread.

Analysis of a complex sentence in grade 5 is for educational purposes and is not a means of control.

Sentence patterns with direct speech: A: “P!” or "P," - a. The concept of quotation is introduced, which coincides in design with direct speech.

The diagrams are supplemented by a break in direct speech with the words of the author: “P, - a. - P.” and "P, - a, - p". The concept of dialogue and ways of its design are introduced.

Schemes are drawn up, but sentences with direct speech are not characterized.


Plan for parsing a simple sentence

1. Determine the type of sentence according to the purpose of the statement (narrative, interrogative, incentive).

2. Find out the type of sentence by emotional coloring (non-exclamatory or exclamatory).

3. Find the grammatical basis of the sentence, underline it and indicate the methods of expression, indicate that the sentence is simple.

4. Determine the composition of the main members of the proposal (two-part or one-part).

5. Determine the presence of minor members (common or non-common).

6. Emphasize the minor members of the sentence, indicate the ways of their expression (parts of speech): from the composition of the subject and the composition of the predicate.

7. Determine the presence of missing members of the sentence (complete or incomplete).

8. Determine the presence of a complication (complicated or not complicated).

9. Write down the characteristics of the proposal.

10. Create an outline of the proposal.

For analysis, we used sentences from Sergei Kozlov’s wonderful fairy tales about the Hedgehog and the Little Bear.

1) It was an extraordinary autumn day!

2) Everyone’s duty is to work.

3) Thirty mosquitoes ran out into the clearing and began to play their squeaky violins.

4) He has neither a father, nor a mother, nor a Hedgehog, nor a Bear.

5) And Belka took some nuts and a cup and hurried after.

6) And they put things in a basket: mushrooms, honey, a teapot, cups - and went to the river.

7) And pine needles, and fir cones, and even cobwebs - everyone straightened up, smiled and began to sing with all their might the last autumn song of the grass.

8) The Hedgehog lay, covered up to his nose with a blanket, and looked at the Little Bear with quiet eyes.

9) The hedgehog sat on a hill under a pine tree and looked at the moonlit valley, flooded with fog.

10) Across the river, the forest was dark, blazing with aspens.

11) So until the evening they ran, jumped, jumped off the cliff and screamed at the top of their lungs, setting off the stillness and silence of the autumn forest.

12) And he jumped like a real kangaroo.

13) Water, where are you running?

14) Maybe he's gone crazy?

15) It seems to me that he imagined himself... as the wind.

Examples of parsing simple sentences