Psychological foundations of professional skills of a physical education teacher. Psychological foundations of vocational training
Read also
· The teaching profession owes its origin to the isolation of education into a special social function, when a specific type of activity was formed in the structure of the social division of labor, the purpose of which is to prepare the younger generations for life on the basis of introducing them to the values of human culture.
- E.A. Klimov developed a scheme of characteristics of professions. According to this scheme, the object teaching profession is a person, and the subject is the activity of his development, education, training. Pedagogical activity belongs to the group of professions “person - person”.
- Like any type of activity, a teacher’s activity has its own structure. It is this: motivation; pedagogical goals and objectives; subject of pedagogical activity; pedagogical means and methods for solving assigned problems; product and result of pedagogical activity.
- In a number of psychological and pedagogical works, two groups of pedagogical functions are distinguished - goal-setting and organizational-structural.
- Pedagogical activity has the same characteristics as any other type of human activity. This is, first of all: focus; motivation; objectivity.
- A specific characteristic of pedagogical activity is its productivity. N.V. Kuzmina identifies five levels of productivity in teaching activities.
· Self-concept is a generalized idea of oneself, a system of attitudes regarding one’s own personality.
- The structure of a teacher’s professional self-awareness: “I-actual” - how the teacher sees and evaluates himself at the present time; “Retrospective self” is how the teacher sees and evaluates himself in relation to the initial stages of work; “Ideal self” is what the teacher would like to be or become; The “reflective self” is how, from the teacher’s point of view, he is viewed and evaluated by others in his professional field.
- The most frequently experimentally studied element of self-awareness is self-esteem. In the structure of self-esteem in general and professional self-esteem in particular, it is advisable to highlight the following aspects: operational-activity; personal.
· In general psychological theories of personality, orientation acts as a quality that determines its psychological make-up. In different concepts, this characteristic is revealed in different ways: “dynamic tendency” (Rubinshtein S.L.); “meaning-forming motive” (Leontyev A.N.); “main life direction” (Ananyev B.G.); “dynamic organization of the “essential forces” of man” (A.S. Prangishvili), etc.
- The structure of the focus consists of three groups of motives: humanistic; personal; business.
- Psychological research on pedagogical problems is carried out in several directions: determining the essence and structure of pedagogical activity; studying the features of its origin; study of the stages and conditions of the formation of pedagogical orientation; analysis of the state and means of its formation.
- In foreign studies, approaches to understanding the essence and structure of pedagogical orientation are grouped in line with three directions: behavioristic; cognitive; humanistic.
- Direction is an integral characteristic of a teacher’s work; it expresses the teacher’s desire for self-realization, growth and development in the sphere of pedagogical life activity (L.M. Mitina).
· The hierarchical structure of a teacher’s pedagogical orientation can be presented as follows: focus on the child (and other people); self-directedness; focus on the subject side of the teaching profession (content of the academic subject).
Municipal secondary education state-financed organization
Secondary school No.
PEDAGOGICAL COUNCIL
Speech on the topic:
Prepared by: M. V. Bajurak
educational psychologist
Orenburg
Augustow Pedagogical Council
Speech on the topic:
« Psychological foundations teacher development
as a subject of professionalization"
I . The ongoing sociocultural, political and economic changes in our country affect all spheres of society and each individual person. The area of professionalization is no exception. The norms of many types of activities are being restructured, new professions are emerging, the relationship between vocational education and professional work, new requirements for a professional are being formed. The process of professionalization ceases to be a strictly socially normed process and requires from a modern person extensive work on constant self-determination and building oneself as a professional.
As a result of the analysis of philosophical, methodological and psychological ideas about the process of professionalization, two different approaches to determining its essence can be distinguished. The first approach is associated with the development and self-development of the individual, and the second - with the “fitting” of a person into one or another system of professional activity or, in other words, “mastering” or “appropriating” a given system of activity.
Then, the main problem of the process of professionalization can be formulated as a contradiction between the system of changing and emerging professional activities and the individual development of each individual person, his formation as a subject.
Thus, in studies of the process of professionalization carried out within the framework of psychological science, the question arises about human development in the process of professionalization. Otherwise, research into the process of professional development comes down to studying the “fitting” of the individual into the system of activity.
In most studies, a person’s professional development is considered as a process of specialist training. Abilities and skills are formed, knowledge is transferred, and complexes of professionally important qualities are formed. Self-activity, self-development of a person as a subject, declared as the most important ontological and methodological principle, is relegated to the background. In general theoretical, philosophical terms, a person has always been considered not as an object, but as a subject of activity, as an actively active, creative being. But in most specific psychological studies this attitude remains declarative. Factors that determine a person’s character and behavior and the psychological mechanisms through which an individual learns different influences And social norms more than one’s own creative activity, self-awareness and the process of personal fulfillment are explored.
An approach to the process of becoming a professional, based on different categorical bases, can be illustrated on the basis of the phenomenological distinction between the concepts of “specialist” and “professional” (V.I. Slobodchikov, 1994).
A specialist is a trained person with certain professional knowledge, skills and abilities. The process of its preparation and formation represents the formation of a complex of professionally important qualities. This interpretation of the concept of “specialist” sets a certain structure for his actions - the reproduction of acquired and assigned skills and methods of performing activities in any situation.
A professional is a characteristic of a person, expressed in his ability to go beyond his own activities for its analysis, evaluation and subsequent organization. The leading concepts for characterizing a person as a professional are “reflection” and “active mode of existence” (N.G. Alekseev, 1987; V.V. Davydov, 1986; S.L. Rubinstein, 1973; V.I. Slobodchikov, 1994 ). A professional independently, focusing on existing cultural patterns and norms, creates his own activities and himself as a professional. Important Features professional are awareness of the limitations of their own activities and maintaining it in a variety of socio-cultural situations. A professional is the result of a person’s self-activity. Therefore, when designing the process of professionalization, we can talk not about its preparation, but rather about the creation of professional and educational environment as the basis of human life.
The study of the process of professionalization as a person’s self-development throughout life, within the framework of which his formation occurs, makes it relevant for modern psychology questions: is a person capable of being a subject of his life in the world, including in the world of professions, namely, a free, purposeful, holistic, developing being; in what empirical forms is it found; How is this process managed?
Practical significance. Based on the results of the study, a system of psychological support for the professionalization of teachers has been developed. This system includes specific methods, techniques and technologies for activating the process of professional development at its different stages.
Of direct practical importance are the programs and methods prepared on the basis of the research results: certification of teaching staff (1994), monitoring the professional development of a specialist (1996), strategies and techniques for professional self-preservation (1997), formation of autopsychological competence of a teacher (1999). .) and psychological support of vocational pedagogical education (1999).
1. The professionalization of a teacher has a complex, contradictory, ambiguously determined, clearly staged character.
2. Pedagogical activity is a holistic and developing psychological reality; designing one's own activities and oneself as a professional is the main mechanism of professionalization.
3. The process of professionalization is influenced by:
psychological readiness to teaching activities as a factor of successful adaptation;
the formation of professional self-awareness and its changes;
autopsychological competence as a property that initiates self-development;
contradictory trends in professional development - crises of professional development.
4. The need for psychological support in the process of becoming a teacher and his strategy.
Periodization of professional development based on ontogenetic development person
Authors of the approachesGrounds (criteria) for periodizing professional development
Stages (periods, phases) of professional development
V. B. Bunak, 1965
Development of mental processes
Stage 1 Progressive Age limit – 20–21 years
Stage 2 Stable
3rd stage Regressive
Age limit: 40–55 years
B. G. Ananyev, 1972
Psychophysiological and social-psychological characteristics of individual development
Stages of a mature person
1st period 2nd period
Age limit: 32–35 years
V. F. Morgun, 1981
Age
Heyday (33–40 years) High performance, dedication, productive creativity
Maturity period (40–55 years) Top life path, the pinnacle of skill
E. I. Stepanova, 1986
Development of psychophysiological functions
1st phase
Functional
progress
2nd phase Specialization
Age limit – stage of middle maturity
professionalization is one of central processes human development, aimed not so much at mastering a fixed volume of professional actions, but at transforming the subject of activity itself;
a change in an object determines the genesis of activity;
the teacher as a subject of professionalization has a subjective potential, which is determined by individual characteristics and is transformed in accordance with the nature and characteristics of professionalization, ensuring the achievement of its productivity;
crises of professional development are characterized by the dynamics of determining factors, changes in the structure of the subject and strategies for overcoming them in the course of professionalization;
psychological support is a factor in enhancing the professional self-development of a teacher.
CONCLUSION:In our opinion, the “litmus” of subjectivity is its manifestation in activity, namely, in the independent and conscious construction of prospects for one’s development in a certain work activity and in life in general, in independent monitoring of one’s activities, finding its meanings and searching for ways to improve oneself.
window.edu.ru/resource/919/79919/files/Vygoranie_i_professionalizatsia_2013.pdf
II . PSYCHOLOGY OF PROFESSIONAL SUITABILITY
“Professional suitability” inherently reflects how different individual characteristics of a person, necessary for the successful performance of labor (educational) activities, his suitability for a specific activity, and the characteristics of the object of work (content, means, conditions, organization of activities) in terms of their compliance with the capabilities of a person (or a professional set of persons), that is, suitability labor for a person.
Professional suitability is a property of the metasystem “person-profession” (“person-activity”, “subject-object”), in which the properties of a person are manifested, acquired by him in connection with the realization of himself in activity (along with the properties of efficiency, reliability, readiness for work etc.), and the property of activity, which reflects the structural and functional features the human body and psyche (for example, ergonomic properties of equipment, workplace, training system, etc.). Here, a person’s professional suitability will be considered as his specific property.
The essence of the category of professional suitability lies in
what it reflects:
choosing the type of activity (profession) that most fully corresponds to the inclinations and abilities of a particular person;
satisfaction of interest in the chosen profession and satisfaction with the process and results of specific work;
a measure of assessing the effectiveness, reliability, safety of performing labor functions,
individual measure of labor productivity;
one of the manifestations of social (professional) self-determination of an individual, his self-affirmation, self-realization, self-improvement in work;
development of the “I-concept”, the emergence and formation of the image of “I
–professional” and the desire of the subject of activity to achieve the standard model of a professional.
The importance of professional suitability, determination of its level and active formation follow from what was said by K.M. Gurevich states: “Every person, in principle, can master any profession (or almost any), but the whole point is how much effort and time it will take.
Professional suitability is also determined by the level of a person’s satisfaction with the process and results of his work. IN modern society A person’s satisfaction with his profession depends not only on the labor process itself, but also on factors external to it, but very significant ones. These include operating conditions, socio-psychological characteristics of the team, level material support, prestige of the profession, etc. Important To create a sense of satisfaction with work, they also have opportunities for self-affirmation, self-esteem and self-improvement of a person.
Property of professional suitability should be considered in two aspects: firstly
first, as a set of initial individual qualities of a person that predetermine the success of developing suitability for a specific activity (or class of activities), and, secondly, as a system of available, formed and interrelated qualities of the subject of activity (professional, psychological, etc.), ensuring effective implementation specific professional tasks.
A person’s professional efficiency and reliability, labor safety are largely determined by the state of his individual psychological qualities and functions, the degree to which a person’s characteristics are taken into account at all stages of design, creation and implementation labor activity.
If a person does not know about the features psychological development professionalization, then he is faced with such a concept as: “Emotional burnout”
Professional burnout is a set of negative experiences associated with work, the team and the entire organization as a whole. One of the types. It often manifests itself in specialists who are forced to communicate closely with people while performing their duties. Signs of professional burnout: 1) a feeling of indifference, emotional exhaustion, exhaustion (a person cannot devote himself to work as he did before); 2) dehumanization (development negative attitude to your colleagues and clients); 3) negative professional self-perception - a feeling of one’s own incompetence, lack of professional skill.
Patience is one of the components of a healthy personality!
Now we will check how patient you are too?
Patience Self-Assessment Questionnaire
The technique was developed and described by E.P. Ilyin and E.K. Feshenko and is intended for self-diagnosis of patience.
Instructions
To work with this technique (to record the results), you will need a blank piece of paper and a pencil (pen). On a piece of paper, write down the question numbers from 1 to 18. Answer whether you agree with the proposed statements. If you agree, then put a “+” sign on the piece of paper next to the question number; if you disagree, put a “–” sign.
Questionnaire text
If I get tired while doing difficult work, I immediately quit it.
I don't have the patience to read a boring story to the end.
I really don’t like standing in long lines and often leave them before I get to the end.
I can endure pain for a long time, for example, when a tooth hurts.
I can usually tolerate thirst for a long time.
I would not be able to withstand a long hunger strike, for example, to lose weight or recover from an illness.
When I get tired in physical education class, I quickly stop doing the exercises.
I rarely quit boring job without completing it.
Usually it’s hard for me to force myself to work “through I can’t.”
I don't quit work halfway, despite the fatigue.
I like this one physical labor, in which I have to overcome myself to complete the task.
I can confidently say that I am patient.
Despite the fatigue, I try my best to maintain a high pace while running.
It irritates me when I have to wait a long time for transport at a bus stop, even when I'm not in a hurry.
I'm impatient with pain.
I act on the principle: “I’ve taken the tug, don’t say it’s not strong,”
I don’t believe that “patience and work will grind everything out”; you need to work smartly, and not overwork.
Processing and interpretation of results
For all answers “Yes” (sign “+”) for positions: 4, 5, 8, 10, 11 12, 13, 16, 17 and all answers “No” (sign “–”) for positions: 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 9, 14, 15, 18 are awarded one point.
Then the total (all answers together) points are calculated.
If you typed:
up to 6 points inclusive – then your patience is low. You are an impatient person; for you, waiting means suffering. However, remember what the popular wisdom says: “Patience and work will grind everything down.”
7–11 points – then your patience is average. You easily adapt to business and communication, but do not forget that the work you start must always be completed.
12 points or more – then your patience is high. You are a patient person, however, you should not waste your energy in vain.
Test "Self-characteristics"
(Study by the manager of the employee’s attitude towards himself)
The technique allows us to identify the current relationship of a subordinate to himself and to significant others (to his immediate supervisor, to surrounding work colleagues, to family and friends, etc.).
Order of conduct. The subordinate is given the task: within 7 minutes, write 20 sentences that begin with the pronoun “I”. Such a strict time parameter is necessary to obtain spontaneous answers when there is not enough time to find socially acceptable answers.
Head teacher _______________
Educational psychologist M. V. Bajurak
Chapter 3. PSYCHOLOGICAL FOUNDATIONS OF TEACHER'S WORK
Psychological studies of teacher work
One of the complex and underdeveloped areas of activity of a psychologist working in education is working with teachers. This can be explained by several reasons:
1) lack of development of a systematic understanding of the process of professional and personal development of a teacher. The teacher development function in the school is provided by the Institute for Advanced Studies, third-party consultants or the head teacher of the school responsible for working with personnel, methodologists or a psychologist. The goals, objectives and methods of working with teachers are not clearly formulated; it is not clear who is responsible for what when resolving the issue of professional development of a teacher;
2) lack of scientifically based criteria for assessing the activities of teaching staff;
4) a decrease in the prestige of teaching work, its social significance, and deterioration in the working conditions of teachers. V.B. Olshansky provides the following data: the workload exceeds the norm for 62.8% of teachers; the teacher performs more than 300 types of activities; Only 14.8% of teachers are completely satisfied with the state of the nervous system, and 50.3% with the state of physical health; the percentage of teacher families breaking up is high; In 25% of families, husbands have a negative attitude towards their wife’s profession as a teacher.
In domestic educational psychology there are quite a lot of studies devoted to the work of a teacher. The structure of pedagogical activity and its functions is analyzed, the qualities of a teacher’s personality are studied, the styles of pedagogical communication and the factors influencing it are described, the typology of a teacher’s personality, the peculiarities of his thinking are given, and the technologies of work of a psychologist with teachers are presented.
Development of the concept of teaching abilities represents a holistic view of pedagogical abilities: characteristics of abilities specific to pedagogical activity, levels of their development, the connection between abilities and the effectiveness of a teacher are given .
Scheme of analysis of teaching activities built on the basis of three basic categories of domestic psychology - activity, communication, personality. The work of a teacher constitutes the unity of the implementation of pedagogical activities, pedagogical communication and self-realization of the teacher’s personality. The effectiveness of work is determined by the training and upbringing of the student, the professional competence of the teacher, who must carry out pedagogical activities and pedagogical communication at a sufficiently high level. This realizes the personality of the teacher, thanks to whom good results are achieved in the education and upbringing of schoolchildren. In each of these three sides the following components are distinguished:
Professional (objectively necessary) psychological and pedagogical knowledge;
Professional (objectively necessary) pedagogical skills;
Professional psychological positions, teacher attitudes;
Personal characteristics that ensure the teacher’s mastery of professional knowledge and skills.
The peculiarity of this approach is that it examines the process and result of a teacher’s work both from the point of view of objective characteristics (professional knowledge and skills) and subjective ones (professional positions and personal characteristics). Thus, a holistic picture of professional competence emerges, which can form the basis for the decisions of many practical issues, in particular: what knowledge does a teacher need to carry out activities? What are the methods for developing professional skills of a teacher? What are the mechanisms of influence on the psychological position of a teacher?
In the structure of pedagogical activity pedagogical goals and objectives, pedagogical means and methods for solving set tasks, analysis and evaluation of the teacher’s pedagogical actions are highlighted. The structure of pedagogical communication, which is considered as the main tool in interaction with the child, is analyzed. Informational, social-perceptual, self-presentational, interactive and affective functions of pedagogical communication are highlighted. Based on two groups of abilities - design-gnostic and reflective-perceptual - five professionally significant qualities necessary for the implementation of pedagogical activity are identified: pedagogical goal setting, pedagogical thinking, pedagogical reflection, pedagogical tact, pedagogical orientation.
First of all, the teacher must develop social perception and emotional reactivity, behavioral flexibility, self-esteem and respect for the child. This is why the proposed traditional methods of teaching teachers (psychological and pedagogical council, seminar, trainings) and original methods for increasing their psychological competence are so important.
The content of the teacher’s activities in the process of mastering pedagogical functions by the teacher includes consideration of the structure of practical thinking and its functional composition. Research speaks about the need to transform psychological knowledge in pedagogical activity, about the development of the teacher’s evaluative and reflective position as a necessary moment and evidence of the maturity of pedagogical activity and the saturation of the mechanism of using knowledge in the teacher’s activity with personal meanings. This approach is a holistic theoretical and experimental study of the processes of using psychological and pedagogical knowledge in the structure of thinking, activity and practical experience of a teacher.
Of great interest are studies of the role places and styles of communication in teaching activities.
These developments undoubtedly enrich psychologists’ ideas about pedagogical activity, but it is necessary special work on their translation into technologies for the practical activities of psychologists and teachers.
Addressing teachers, W. James wrote: “You are very deeply mistaken if you think that from psychology, i.e. From the science of the laws of mental life, certain programs, plans or teaching methods can be derived directly for school use. Psychology is a science and teaching is an art. Logic has not yet taught a single person to think correctly, and in the same way, scientific ethics has not yet forced anyone to act well. Science only indicates the boundaries within which the rules of art are applicable, and the laws that those who practice this art must not cross.”
Questions and tasks
What, in your opinion, are the objective and subjective factors that complicate the work of a teacher?
Why is interaction with a teacher one of the most difficult areas of work for an educational psychologist?
Think back to your experience at school. Which teacher, in your opinion, was the most effective and successful?
Justify your answer.
Seminar plan
"Psychology of teacher's work"
1. Structure of teaching activity.
2. The place of communication in the activities of a teacher.
3. The concept of “teacher effectiveness” and approaches to its assessment.
1. Main literature Kuzmina N.V., Rean A.L.
2. Professionalism of teaching activities. St. Petersburg, 1993. Mitina L.M.
3. Psychology of teacher professional development. M., 1998. Markova A.K.
Psychology of teacher work. M., 1993.
4. additional literature Batrakova S.N.
5. Fundamentals of professional and pedagogical communication. Yaroslavl, 1986. James W.
6. Conversations with a teacher about psychology. M., 1998. Erastov N.P.
7. Psychology of communication. Yaroslavl, 1979. Kashapov M.M.
Psychology of pedagogical thinking. Monograph. St. Petersburg, 2000.
8. Teacher's thinking / Ed. Yu.N. Kulyutkina, G.S. Sukhobskaya. M., 1990.
The place of psychology in the activities of a teacher
The activity of a teacher largely depends on what his ideas are about the space of his professional existence, about the mechanisms of pedagogical communication, the nature of the psychological characteristics of students, etc. Any pedagogical practice, including individual “educational acts” of a particular teacher, is based on certain psychological views of varying degrees of formalization and awareness. These views can be formed both spontaneously - throughout a person’s life, and purposefully - in the process of a teacher’s acquaintance with theoretical approaches formed in psychological science, through the formation of psychological competence in specially organized conditions for this, during communication with a professional psychologist when solving personal problems. problems.
E.A. Klimov believes that “preparedness in the field of psychology is, first of all, clear ideas about a specific mental reality, accompanied by a positive affective tone, associated with an insatiable interest in it and a willingness to directly contact it in interpersonal communication.” A psychologically prepared teacher must first of all have a “heightened sense of the animation” of outside people, and not just verbal, conceptual knowledge of the corresponding kind. Students, without sufficient theoretical knowledge, carry out “homemade” subjective explanations and constructions in their heads.
At the same time, it is well known that the instrumentality and practicality of theoretical knowledge in psychology obtained at a pedagogical university remains low. Many studies have found that the majority of teachers are not satisfied with their psychological training and its practical orientation. Graduates of a pedagogical university “do not realize the constructive possibilities of psychological theory” (Yu.N. Kulyutkin), “do not and cannot use the psychological knowledge they received at the university” (B.M. Masterov).
The ineffectiveness of the work of a psychologist with teachers in a university, when the psychologist acts as a teacher of one or another psychological discipline, or in an educational institution where the psychologist is called upon to provide educational practice, lies in the fact that the psychologist is focused primarily on transferring ready-made knowledge, one or another theoretical constructions that in themselves do not significantly affect the actual practice of teaching.
Contradictions between the requirements, characteristics and conditions of a student’s educational activity and his future professional activity look like this:
1) between the abstract subject of educational and cognitive activity (texts, sign systems, action programs) and the real subject of the acquired professional activity;
2) between the integrity of the content of professional activity and students’ mastery of it through many subject areas;
3) between the way of existence of professional activity as a process and its representation in training in the form of static systems of ready-made knowledge and algorithms of actions that are subject to memorization and assimilation;
4) between the social form of existence of professional activity, the collective nature of work and individual form its appropriation by students;
5) between the involvement in the labor processes of the entire personality of a specialist at the level creative thinking and social activity and reliance in learning on the processes of attention, memory, perception;
6) between the “responsive” position of the student and the proactive position of the specialist;
7) between the focus of the content of educational activity on past social experience and the student’s orientation towards the future content of professional activity.
The technology of sign-contextual learning proposed on the basis of the analysis of these contradictions ensures the consistent transformation of the student’s educational activity into professional activity young specialist.
To partially remove the above contradictions, active learning methods are also used: business, innovation and organizational-activity games, analysis specific situations, role-playing games, group discussions, etc. Experience with their use shows that they provide a solution educational objectives, difficult to achieve in traditional training, such as:
Fostering a research attitude to reality;
Formation of not only cognitive, but also professional motives and interests;
Developing systems thinking for a specialist;
Training in collective mental work, “official” interaction and communication, individual and joint decision-making, responsible attitude towards business and other people, creative initiative.
Ways to improve the psychological training of a teacher see in strengthening the practical orientation of the psychology course at the university, in identifying the constructive possibilities of psychological knowledge, in the psychologization of the goals, content and methods of teacher education.
A promising direction for the development of education and, in particular, the teacher is design paradigm. In modern methodology, the foundations and means of designing education have been developed.
Pedagogical education design technology, developed by V.I. Slobodchikov, involves identifying types of work and the main steps of project activity. First type of work - this is the conceptualization, or development of the concept of the projected transformation. Second type of work associated with programming a set of necessary activities in their logical and time sequence. Third type of work - planning actions for project implementation, including designation of types of developments, real tasks of performers, final results and their consumers. Fourth type of work - this is the practical implementation of a plan as purposeful, the formation of a special kind of resources: intellectual-volitional, moral-positional, organizational, managerial, professional and activity-based, etc. Design turns out to be a means of building science-oriented educational practice, including pedagogical, in this approach.
O.S. Anisimov believes that a teacher can become an active participant in his changes if they are realized and accepted by him. “The process of acceptance can proceed in a controlled form, as self-determination, which presupposes having appropriate knowledge about oneself and self-awareness... A person can become what he builds himself into, into whom he self-develops.” The emergence of the need for self-change is a consequence of the construction of reflection and the implementation of actions.
The highest level of development of pedagogical activity is the fact that the teacher sets goals for the formation of self-development mechanisms and is capable of transferring to students his ability for self-development. When working with teachers, it is proposed to focus on the formation of the foundations of mental activity. Transferring the teacher to a reflexive position, to systematic self-knowledge in a practical situation, overcoming the phenomenon of “multiplicity of knowledge about the same thing,” theoretical schematization of empirical material, awareness of the features of reflexive procedures, procedural reconstruction of processes in the object of knowledge and modeling of modification of these processes - this is just some stages of transforming teaching activities into research activities with the help of practical actions.
O. S. Anisimov identifies the following conditions that stimulate the implementation of the unity of practical and research functions in teaching activities:
Development of the reflective element in teaching activities;
Complicating the values and goals of pedagogical activity;
Realization of the value of cultural-activity and cultural-mental organization and self-organization of pedagogical activity;
Transition to managing group forms of educational and pedagogical activities;
A gradual and purposeful transition from training and education to the formation of the ability for self-learning and self-education)