Where did this ship come from? Lost in Space - What Happened to the Robot? (and other questions). Where did this alien ship come from?

I decided to review quadrology in chronological order to make it even more pleasing. And everything is so good, everything is so smooth and cheerful... until the third part began. As we know, at the end of the previous film, the female Alien was thrown into space on the lower deck and in principle she did not walk on the Sulaco, not to mention the fact that she did not have an egg. So where did it come from?

At first, why not, I thought about a movie blooper. I was somewhat upset and puzzled - how could this be? I decided to think about it - but really, how? And I came to an unexpected (for myself), but obvious conclusion - android Bishop! Now everything has fallen into place.

How did you live to live like this? or Proof of guilt

Now let's look at the facts:

And here is the denouement - evidence against Bishop. Ripley takes the elevator down to the lower levels, right? okay - so why when she returns to the elevators are they both on top? This means that someone from above called both of them and either went down or went up or did it for that reason. to apprehend our brave lieutenant below. And since Hicks was wounded and injected himself with some kind of nasty thing, he most likely was not in adequate health and did not control Bishop, which means the latter could go down into the catacombs. take a couple ( exactly a couple) eggs, pick them up, fly into orbit, hide them in cryochamber and go back.

On one of the forums I came across a refutation of this scenario - why would Bishop come back then?? I would fly home. BUT! the one who wrote this was inattentive - in Bishop’s directive there is no longer a requirement to save the Alien at any cost - therefore he was obliged to fly back because: “A robot cannot harm a person or by your inaction allow so that a person is harmed” (A. Azimov, 1st law). And as another person correctly noted there, no one clearly forbade Bishop from taking Aliens on the ship (in this case, he most likely would have had to obey - that’s why he kept as quiet as he could). Well, as an apotheosis - in the third part of the quadrology, Bishop honestly admits to a direct question from Ripley - “ The alien on the Sulaco was with us all the time" And why could there be several eggs? To be on the safe side, in the third part one “face grabber” inoculates Ripley, the second one tries to find the victim, but in the confusion of evacuating the cryochamber it doesn’t work out. But after “ soft landing” on the planet Fiorina “Fury” 161 finds a carrier - an ox.

And here's another interesting point– when Ripley descended into the catacombs, she left lit beacons for guidance. When he came out of there, the camera again lowered itself at her feet, snatched out one burning saber and went to close-up. It could just be the work of the operator... or maybe a hint. What exactly are they showing us there, maybe there was something else nearby?

What is the conclusion? And the conclusion is unexpected! The film is really capacious, multifaceted and interesting!

Russian cosmonauts repaired a hole in the Soyuz MS-09 spacecraft right in outer space. Let us remind you that the ship docked to the ISS on June 8, it delivered Roscosmos cosmonaut Sergei Prokopyev and NASA and European astronauts to the station. space agency Serena Auñon and Alexander Gerst. They were met by Russian Oleg Artemyev and US representatives Andrew Feustel and Richard Arnold. At the end of August, a drop in air pressure was recorded on board the ISS. After this, Russian cosmonauts found a hole in the hull of the ship's living compartment and patched it up. MIR 24 correspondent Dmitry Barbash found out the details incredible story.

August 30. Moscow region. Mission control center. Sensors installed on the ISS begin transmitting to the ground. The pressure and oxygen levels at the station drop. The situation is abnormal. Moreover, the crew did not report any incidents.

The hole will now be examined from the outside. During the next exit to open space the inhabitants of the ISS examine the Soyuz. Maybe then it will become clear where this “dark hole” came from. Roscosmos suggests waiting until the end of the investigation.

New versions of where the man-made hole in the Russian spaceship docked to the ISS came from are turning this story into absolute bedlam.

It is natural: after the attacker was not found on Earth, he was found in space.

This was done by the Kommersant newspaper. Moreover, this publication, which is generally close to the liberal camp, places the blame for creating a hole in the Russian Soyuz MS-09 spacecraft on the Americans.

Well, stupid...

As usual, the newspaper referred to its sources in the state corporation Roscosmos. This is fine. Constantinople also has many trusted sources, whose information is not only confirmed in the future, but also gives a correct understanding of various, including ambiguous, situations.

IN in this case Kommersant presents this version with reference to the source.

First. The hole in Soyuz MS-09 was drilled in space. This was done (the publication prudently writes: they could have drilled it) by American astronauts. Goal: someone on the American crew fell ill, and they wanted to bring him to Earth as soon as possible.

Second. Marks on the sheathing at the drilling site show that the drill was torn off - apparently “due to the fact that the drill did not have a stop (no pressure was applied to it).” Further, Kommersant gives an excellent statement: this is “typical for work in airless space.” Apparently, they forgot that there is actually air on the ISS, since the hole in the vacuum was made so that it would not be there. But most likely, they meant conditions of weightlessness, when you really need to be fixed even in order to tighten a screw. It’s another matter, however, that cosmonauts practice their skills in working in zero gravity on Earth, but let’s assume that the Americans don’t do this. Stupid, as Mikhail Zadornov explained.

Third. Further actions Americans seem to be hinting that it’s time to perforate spaceship they are involved. For example, their commander Andrew Feustel behaved very strangely, almost pushing his Russian colleagues away from the hole, insisting that they had to wait another day while Houston and Korolev decided how exactly it should be sealed. Let’s agree, it’s illogical: his air is being vented into space, and he coolly offers to endure this for an extra day. Maybe so that after this there would be no other choice but to urgently evacuate? And there the household compartment, where the hole was made, will separate and burn in the atmosphere, and everything will be sewn and covered.

And, by the way, traces of glue near the hole - but it was still sealed - were non-factory. Maybe American.

That may be true, but, firstly, the air should have escaped through such a hole only in 18 days. And secondly, how can one imagine that American villains penetrated the Soyuz? After all, this is not accepted without the permission of the Russian commander. Did they get him drunk, or what? So he’s a combat pilot... He flew long-range and strategic bombers and took part in hostilities. How can the Americans get him drunk after serving in the Russian Air Force?

Kommersant explains this in the words of its source: “Our Soyuz is standing at the Rassvet module - this is right next to the gateway to the American part of the station. We cannot rule out unauthorized access by Americans.”

But in general, this picture is still not without contradictions and illogical motivations. Unless, however, you use Zadornov’s universal explanation.

But there is, however, another assumption...

Yes, my colleagues’ version can be quite confidently supplemented by another, which puts in place both the motivation and the possibility of Americans having access to the Russian ship.

Where was the hole made in it? At the sewage disposal unit. By the toilet, to put it simply. And then I immediately remember a funny, but then quietly forgotten story. Somewhere a little over a month ago Russian media A fake news story from a fictitious news site has circulated about the fact that Roscosmos, represented by its “chief plumbing engineer” Alexander Kulibin, refused to repair a broken toilet in the American segment of the ISS. Like, they give us sanctions, but we fix their toilets? Let them wear their spacesuits.

Some believed, others just had fun. But the fact is that there is no smoke without fire: the toilet - by the way, made in Russia and cost 19 million dollars - has broken down more than once for the Americans. And just on July 3, NASA’s annual report was published, which stated that the corporation ordered from the Russian RSC Energia “ Maintenance and replacing a number of toilet elements on the US segment of the International Space Station.”

And here everything comes together. Astronauts are not very successful at changing something. They go to the astronauts with a request that is close to intimate. Those - not animals - let their colleagues pass. But not to your bathroom in the Zvezda module, but to one that is, so to speak, temporarily out of service - on the Soyuz spacecraft. Again, close to the American gateway: it’s convenient, and they won’t spy on any secrets. And then one of the Americans - or maybe a German, but why would he, he’s actually a volcanologist - got angry about something and decided to make trouble for the Russians. Perhaps the protest was expressed in this way for Putin’s interference in the American elections.

What if there are no jokes?

And jokes aside, then the same thing remains as Tsargrad said earlier: with a “cosmic” reason for sabotage, the motivation for the act remains unclear for the attacker, as well as the method of execution. In the end, you have to at least somehow take the drill with you to the toilet. And for the sake of evacuating someone to Earth for medical reasons, there are less exotic solutions.

Unless one of the astronauts really had a secret mission to discredit Russian cosmonautics. Especially in light of the actual promises made by Roscosmos to stop transporting Americans to the ISS from April 2019. This version, which explains the appearance of a hole in the Soyuz, however, also smacks of some exoticism, but at least it is not devoid of logic, even from the point of view of the special services.

By the way, the FSB is also working on investigating the incident together with the Roscosmos commission. This means that there is something there that threatens national security.

Roscosmos, represented by its official representative Vladimir Ustimenko, refused to comment on the version of intentional damage to the Soyuz MS-09 spacecraft by US astronauts. “We will refrain from commenting until the results of the special commission’s work are published,” he said firmly, but, if you look at it objectively, quite vaguely.

Officials from the Russian side do not show any aggression - even informational - towards their colleagues from NASA. The head of Roscosmos, Dmitry Rogozin, said that the investigation is still ongoing, and the deadline for its completion has not been established. “Specialists are primarily interested in the truth, so time does not matter here. But, naturally, within reasonable limits,” he said. In the meantime, he said, “the results we received do not give us an objective picture.” However, he also added something significant: “The situation turned out to be much more complicated than we previously thought.”

In other words, the situation remains open. It’s all the more interesting to watch her further.

It is natural: after the attacker was not found on Earth, he was found in space.

This was done by the Kommersant newspaper. Moreover, this publication, which is generally close to the liberal camp, places the blame for creating a hole in the Russian Soyuz MS-09 spacecraft on the Americans.

Well, stupid...

As usual, the newspaper referred to its sources in the state corporation Roscosmos. This is fine. Constantinople also has many trusted sources, whose information is not only confirmed in the future, but also gives a correct understanding of various, including ambiguous, situations.

In this case, Kommersant presents such a version with reference to the source.

First. The hole in Soyuz MS-09 was drilled in space. This was done (the publication prudently writes: they could have drilled it) by American astronauts. Goal: someone on the American crew fell ill, and they wanted to bring him to Earth as soon as possible.

Second. Marks on the sheathing at the drilling site show that the drill was torn off - apparently “due to the fact that the drill did not have a stop (no pressure was applied to it).” Further, Kommersant gives an excellent statement: this is “typical for work in airless space.” Apparently, they forgot that there is actually air on the ISS, since the hole in the vacuum was made so that it would not be there. But most likely, they meant conditions of weightlessness, when you really need to be fixed even in order to tighten a screw. It’s another matter, however, that cosmonauts practice their skills in working in zero gravity on Earth, but let’s assume that the Americans don’t do this. Stupid, as Mikhail Zadornov explained.

Third. Further actions of the Americans seem to hint that they are still involved in making holes in the spacecraft. For example, their commander Andrew Feustel behaved very strangely, almost pushing his Russian colleagues away from the hole, insisting that they had to wait another day while Houston and Korolev decided how exactly it should be sealed. Let’s agree, it’s illogical: his air is being vented into space, and he coolly offers to endure this for an extra day. Maybe so that after this there would be no other choice but to urgently evacuate? And there the household compartment, where the hole was made, will separate and burn in the atmosphere, and everything will be sewn and covered.

And, by the way, traces of glue near the hole - but it was still sealed - were not factory-made. Maybe American.

That may be true, but, firstly, the air should have escaped through such a hole only in 18 days. And secondly, how can one imagine that American villains penetrated the Soyuz? After all, this is not accepted without the permission of the Russian commander. Did they get him drunk, or what? So he’s a combat pilot... He flew long-range and strategic bombers and took part in hostilities. How can the Americans get him drunk after serving in the Russian Air Force?

Kommersant explains this in the words of its source: “Our Soyuz is standing at the Rassvet module - this is right next to the gateway to the American part of the station. We cannot rule out unauthorized access by Americans.”

But in general, this picture is still not without contradictions and illogical motivations. Unless, however, you use Zadornov’s universal explanation.

But there is, however, another assumption...

Yes, my colleagues’ version can be quite confidently supplemented by another, which puts in place both the motivation and the possibility of Americans having access to the Russian ship.

Where was the hole made in it? At the sewage disposal unit. By the toilet, to put it simply. And then I immediately remember a funny, but then quietly forgotten story. Somewhere a little over a month ago, the Russian media heard a fake news story from a made-up news site that supposedly Roscosmos, represented by its “chief plumbing engineer” Alexander Kulibin, refused to repair a broken toilet in the American segment of the ISS. Like, they give us sanctions, but we fix their toilets? Let them wear their spacesuits.

Some believed, others just had fun. But the fact is that there is no smoke without fire: the toilet - by the way, made in Russia and cost 19 million dollars - has broken down more than once for the Americans. And just on July 3, NASA’s annual report was published, which stated that the corporation ordered from the Russian RSC Energia “maintenance and replacement of a number of toilet elements on the American segment of the International Space Station.”

And here everything comes together. Astronauts are not very successful at changing something. They go to the astronauts with a request that is close to intimate. Those - not animals - let their colleagues pass. But not to your bathroom in the Zvezda module, but to one that is, so to speak, temporarily out of service - on the Soyuz spacecraft. Again, close to the American gateway: it’s convenient and they won’t spy on any secrets. And then one of the Americans - or maybe a German, but why would he, he’s actually a volcanologist - got angry about something and decided to make trouble for the Russians. Perhaps the protest was expressed in this way for Putin’s interference in the American elections.

What if there are no jokes?

And jokes aside, then the same thing remains as Tsargrad said earlier: with a “cosmic” reason for sabotage, the motivation for the act remains unclear for the attacker, as well as the method of execution. In the end, you have to at least somehow take the drill with you to the toilet. And for the sake of evacuating someone to Earth for medical reasons, there are less exotic solutions.

Unless one of the astronauts really had a secret mission to discredit Russian cosmonautics. Especially in light of the actual promises made by Roscosmos to stop transporting Americans to the ISS from April 2019. This version, which explains the appearance of a hole in the Soyuz, however, also smacks of some exoticism, but at least it is not devoid of logic, even from the point of view of the special services.

Drew Feistel (left), Oleg Artemyev (center), Ricky Arnold (right). Before the launch of the Union to the International space station from the Baikonur Cosmodrome in March 2018. Photo: www.globallookpress.com

By the way, the FSB is also working on investigating the incident together with the Roscosmos commission. This means that there is something there that threatens national security.

Roscosmos, represented by its official representative Vladimir Ustimenko, refused to comment on the version of intentional damage to the Soyuz MS-09 spacecraft by US astronauts. “We will refrain from commenting until the results of the special commission’s work are published,” he said firmly, but, if you look at it objectively, quite vaguely.

Officials from the Russian side do not show any aggression - even informational - towards their colleagues from NASA. The head of Roscosmos, Dmitry Rogozin, said that the investigation is still ongoing, and the deadline for its completion has not been established. “Specialists are primarily interested in the truth, so time does not matter here. But, naturally, within reasonable limits,” he said. In the meantime, he said, “the results we received do not give us an objective picture.” However, he also added something significant: “The situation turned out to be much more complicated than we previously thought.”

In other words, the situation remains open. It’s all the more interesting to watch her further.

Today, my little friends, we will learn how shipbuilding has developed over thousands of years of human development. What kind of vessels it began with, and what kind of ships exist in our time. The very first vessel on which man first sailed on water was a raft. People got tired of looking for a ford to get across wide rivers and they figured out how to swim along them without hindrance and transport luggage.

Nowadays, steamships are no longer used. They were replaced by motor ships, electric ships and nuclear powered ships. Such a ship flies across the expanses of the sea at tremendous speed. Instead of paddle wheels it has propeller screw, which moves the ship much faster, screwing into the water. Not ships, but entire floating cities now float on.

Modern ships are built at shipyards and are also designed for different purposes. There are powerful military cruisers, lined with thick, strong armor, that sail along maritime boundaries our homeland, protecting the territory from smugglers, poachers and other violators.