What the Vedas say about chemtrails. Chemtrails: what and why are they spraying around the world? What's in this cocktail

The CIA has already openly informed everyone about the use of chemtrails, chemtrails.

Chemtrails in the sky of St. Petersburg, in the sky of St. Petersburg cause constant artificial rains.
Below is the full text of the speech in native language.

What are Chemtrails and why do we constantly spoil the weather?
In fact, the program to destroy extra mouths on the planet and reduce the world's population to a golden billion was developed and launched a very long time ago. The first patents were received back in 1925, when the Russians missed this moment and did not save the World in time from the most terrible weapon of Mankind. The Russians can be understood - they were simply not up to it. Then they staged famines for us, destroying the Harvests, with these Chemtrails, and We did not know what it was. Now in the desert In Africa, in the United Arab Emirates they are deliberately causing droughts, and in St. Petersburg they are pouring all the water on the fields to cause a famine in us again, this year in Russia, when in September NATO again wants to start a global war against Russia. Well, well, you can - The whole crop is already floating. But their tanks will definitely get stuck in the mud.

Rosalind Peterson Confirms Chemtrails/Geoengineering/SRM
Are very real.

If you are still in doubt that them lines in the sky are contrails or that the milky haze which lingers all day is NOTHING TO WORRY ABOUT, then you are very mistaken

This is PROOF 100% Real.
The CIA published a report on its website that confirms the US program to artificially shape the weather around the world. In America, chemtrails in the sky have long been widely used - but they explain to everyone there that these are supposedly contrails of aircraft. If you have looked at least once, then you have definitely seen these white footprints in the sky. One, two, is not yet so striking and everyone is already used to it, but when now there are 20 tracks in a row to consolidate the result, this is already suggestive, even to gullible Russians.
In the next topic, I will now post terrible pictures as a separate topic - I’ll just give a link here, otherwise the text will be lost.

CIA Director Brennan's speech at the Council on Foreign Relations was translated into Russian from the official CIA website on June 29, 2016.

The American Brennan does admit that chemtrail geoengineering has been around for a long time, but now he is denying it and telling everyone tales about the beaver uncle, who wants to save humanity at the expense of the population and works hard day and night to help reduce high air temperatures within the framework of "fight against global warming". Ha, ha, ha... Have you seen Summer in St. Petersburg this year? I have never seen such a shocking amount of chemtrails.

"... large-scale technologies, often referred to as geoengineering, that could potentially help reverse warming, a consequence of global climate change. What I'm referring to is stratospheric aerosol injection, or SAI. This is a method of seeding in the stratosphere of special particles that help reflect the sun's heat. In many ways, this happens in the same way as volcanoes erupt" - Brennan at a Council meeting.

So why should we lower the air temperature this year in St. Petersburg and pour rain on us, where there is always little sun anyway? Why immerse our most beautiful city in darkness and cause mold for 20 years already! The city is being destroyed by this mold! plaster from constant dampness is pouring at an incredible speed. Walk through the city and look at the once most beautiful houses - you will not find a single whole house, and the old ones are not being restored. You will not find a single complete fence and lattice of the Bridge. Can you imagine what happens in our stomachs when we drink this water and eat food grown under such rains and inhale this mold that is sprayed along with heavy metal oxides? This is a definite, and deliberate sabotage!

(Original: Another example is the array of technologies—often referred to collectively as geoengineering—that potentially could help reverse the warming effects of global climate change. One that has gained my personal attention is stratospheric aerosol injection, or SAI, a method of seeding the stratosphere with particles that can help reflect the sun's heat, in much the same way that volcanic eruptions do.)

Previously, materials and information about the use around the world of special aerosols - chemtrails, which are supposedly visible only to the inflamed imagination of supporters of conspiracy theories of a global government, were engaged in proving that such a government does not exist and this is all our imagination. In all searches, you will find that it is absolutely safe, and we are all sick people. I might have believed it if, first, my daughter at the age of 5, and then I had not been cut out for stomach cancer. So I'm just warning the rest.

Video on this topic from alternative American media (with translation):

Recall that two years ago, at one of the highest official levels (UN conferences), Rosalind Peterson, President of the Agriculture Defense Coalition, delivered a speech. She said that chemicals sprayed by US government jets and private corporations to change the climate are having a detrimental effect on agriculture, as well as the health of forest plantations and of course people, especially children and the elderly. Link to video (report in English): UN recognizes the danger of chemtrails
In the early 1990s, it was partially declassified that Western governments added a whole range of different radioactive isotopes, aluminum oxide, strontium, and other heavy metals to aviation fuel, explaining that geoengineering is engaged in climate control on the planet and it should be subsidized at our expense. . That is, at our expense, we are being destroyed. Patents have been in force since 1925, from the moment when the Russians were no longer up to saving the Planet. https://www.google.com/patents/US1619183- Patents

Chemtrails. UN recognizes the danger of chemtrails
Make a good translation

Director Brennan Speaks at the Council on Foreign Relations

Remarks as Prepared for Delivery by Central Intelligence Agency Director John O. Brennan at the Council on Foreign Relations, Washington, DC

It is indeed a pleasure to be back at the Council to compare notes on a remarkably complex and dynamic international scene. I very much look forward to talking with Judy and Council membership on the many topics that are in the headlines, but I will first offer some brief opening remarks to kick off our conversation.

Whenever I administer the oath of office to new officers at our Headquarters in Langley, Virginia, I tell them that they are coming aboard at a critical moment in our Agency’s history. In the 36 years since I first entered government, I have never seen a time with such a daunting array of challenges to our Nation's security. Notable among those challenges is that some of the institutions and relationships that have been pillars of the post-Cold War international system are under serious stress.

As you well know, the United Kingdom voted last week to leave the European Union. Of all the crises the EU has faced in recent years, the UK vote to leave the EU may well be its greatest challenge. BREXIT is pushing the EU into a period of introspection that will pervade virtually everything the EU does in the coming weeks, months, and even years. Euroskeptics around Europe—including in Denmark, France, Italy, and the Netherlands—are demanding their own referendums on multiple EU issues; this will surely make decision making and forging consensus in the EU much harder.

No member state has ever left the Union, so Europe is entering a period of uncertainty as the UK and EU take stock of the situation and begin staking out their negotiating positions. Discussions about how an exit will work will dominate the EU agenda in the months ahead. Negotiations for the exit agreement will not begin until the Prime Minister formally notifies the EU of the UK’s intention to leave, which Prime Minister David Cameron has said will occur under his successor. EU and member-state leaders-excluding the UK-will be meeting in the coming days and weeks to begin laying the groundwork for negotiations.

Regardless of what lies ahead, I would like to take this opportunity to say that the BREXIT vote will not adversely affect the intelligence partnership between the United States and the United Kingdom in the months and years ahead. Indeed, I spoke to my counterpart in London early Monday morning, and we reaffirmed to one another that the bonds of friendship and cooperation between our services are only destined to grow stronger in the years ahead. These ties are-and will always be-essential to our collective security.

I presume a few of you have questions about terrorism and the so-called Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant, and I look forward to addressing them in the question and answer session. I know that our collective hearts go out to the families of the victims of the horrific terrorist perpetrated as well as incited by ISIL; the despicable attack at Istanbul’s International Airport yesterday that killed dozens and injured many more certainly bears the hallmarks of ISIL’s depravity.

Let me take a few moments to say a few words about some less discussed but still very important issues that we at CIA and our colleagues throughout the Intelligence Community are watching closely.

I'll start with the overarching challenge of instability, which continues to grip large sections of the globe.

Global instability is one of the defining issues of our time, and its implications are hard to overstate. As instability spreads, extremists and terrorists are finding sanctuary in ungoverned spaces. Energy supplies are being disrupted. Political reform is suffering as too many governments opt for authoritarian measures at the expense of democratic principles and respect for human rights.

Most devastating of all is the human toll attendant to instability. Last week, the United Nations reported that the number of people displaced by global instability and conflict had reached 65 million-the highest figure ever recorded.

In a host of countries, from East Asia to the Middle East to West Africa, governments are under stress, and civic institutions are struggling to provide basic services and to maintain law and order. As governments in these regions recede from the center of national life, more people are shifting their allegiances away from the nation state and towards sub-national groups, leading societies that once embraced a national identity to fracture along ethnic and sectarian lines.

Nowhere is this trend more evident than in the Middle East, a region I have studied closely for much of my professional life. When I lived there years ago, I liked to walk through neighborhoods and villages to observe the rhythms of everyday life. I remember seeing people of different backgrounds and beliefs living side by side, secular and devout.

Today, relations among these groups are too often marred by suspicion and distrust and even outright hostility. Extremist groups have played a key role in fueling these tensions, luring impressionable young men and women to join their cause, and spreading false narratives meant to divide and inflame.

In some areas, a whole generation is growing up in an environment of militarism, without a chance to develop the skills to contribute to or even to engage in modern-day society.

The underlying causes of these trends are complex and difficult to address and the long-term consequences of these developments are deeply troubling. Global instability is an issue that affects all countries, from Russia to China to the United States, and it must be met by a strong, collective response from the international community. I am certain it will loom large on the agenda of the next Administration.

Another strategic challenge is dealing with the tremendous power, potential, opportunities, and risks resident in the digital domain. No matter how many geopolitical crises are seizing the headlines, the reliability, security, vulnerability, and range of human activity taking place within cyber space are constantly on my mind.

On the cyber security front, organizations of all kinds are under constant attack from a range of actors…foreign governments, criminal gangs, extremist groups, “cyber activists,” and many others. In this new and relatively uncharted frontier, speed and agility are king. Malicious actors have shown they can penetrate a network and withdraw in very short order, plundering systems without anyone knowing they were there until maybe after the damage is done.

While I served at the White House, cyber was part of my portfolio, and it was always the subject that gave me the biggest headache. Cyber ​​attackers are determined and adaptive. They often collaborate and share expertise. And they come at you in so many different ways, with an ever-changing array of tools, tactics, and techniques.

Moreover, our laws have not yet adequately adapted to the emergence of this new digital frontier. Most worrisome, from my perspective, is that there is still no political or national consensus on the appropriate role of the government-law enforcement, homeland security, and intelligence agencies-in safeguarding the security, reliability, resiliency, and prosperity of the digital domain .

The Intelligence Community is making great strides in countering cyber threats, but much work remains to be done. As we move forward on this issue, one thing we know is that private industry will have a huge role to play, as the vast majority of the internet is in private hands. Protecting it is not something the government can do on its own.

Right up there with terrorism, global instability, and cyber security is nuclear proliferation and the accompanying development of delivery systems-both tactical and strategic-that make all too real the potential for a nuclear event. Unsurprisingly, top on my list of countries of concern is North Korea, whose authoritarian and brutal leader has wantonly pursued a nuclear weapons program to threaten regional states and the United States instead of taking care of the impoverished and politically repressed men, women, and children of North Korea.

So what else is there besides terrorism, global instability, cyber security, and nuclear proliferation that worries the CIA Director and keeps CIA officers busy around the clock and around the globe?

Well, as a liberal arts guy from the baby boomer generation, the rapid pace of technological change during my lifetime has been simply dizzying. Moreover, as we have seen with just about every scientific leap forward, new technologies often carry substantial risks to the same degree that they hold tremendous promise.

Nowhere are the stakes higher for our national security than in the field of biotechnology. Recent advances in genome-editing that offer great potential for breakthroughs in public health are also cause for concern, because the same methods could be used to create genetically-engineered biological warfare agents. And though the overwhelming majority of nation states have tended to be rational enough to refrain from unleashing a menace with such unpredictable consequences, a subnational terrorist entity such as ISIL would have few complications in wielding such a weapon.

The scope of the bio threat-as well as potential measures to mitigate it-were laid out very clearly last October in the bipartisan report of the Blue Ribbon Study Panel on Biodefense, chaired by former Senator Joe Lieberman and former Homeland Defense Secretary Tom Ridge. As with the cyber threat, the international community’s response to this issue lags behind the technology driving it. Effectively countering this danger requires the development of national and international strategies, along with a consensus on the laws, standards, and authorities that will be needed.

And as CIA officers and their Intelligence Community colleagues work hard to protect our country from the darker side of technological change, we are mindful of how even beneficial advances can have destabilizing effects in the long run. Agency all-source analysts, drawing from academic studies and other elements of the ever-expanding pool of global open-source information, seek to offer our national leaders early warning of potential challenges that could arise from the advances we are seeing today across the spectrum of technological endeavors.

As former Defense Secretary and CIA Director Bob Gates is fond of saying, “When intelligence officers smell flowers, they look around for a coffin.” That remains a pretty good depiction of our intelligence mindset.

One example-again taking a page from the biotech and life-sciences sectors-is how a wide range of breakthroughs that potentially could extend life expectancy, such as new methods of fighting cancer and a greater understanding of the aging process, could reinforce the trend towards older populations in advanced nations. Some of the world’s leading economies could face stronger headwinds from having significantly larger proportions of retired people relative to working-age citizens.

Another example is the array of technologies—often referred to collectively as geoengineering—that could potentially help reverse the warming effects of global climate change. One that has gained my personal attention is stratospheric aerosol injection, or SAI, a method of seeding the stratosphere with particles that can help reflect the sun’s heat, in much the same way that volcanic eruptions do.

An SAI program could limit global temperature increases, reducing some risks associated with higher temperatures and providing the world economy additional time to transition from fossil fuels. The process is also relatively inexpensive—the National Research Council estimates that a fully deployed SAI program would cost about $10 billion yearly.

As promising as it may be, moving forward on SAI would raise a number of challenges for our government and for the international community. On the technical side, greenhouse gas emission reductions would still have to accompany SAI to address other climate change effects, such as ocean acidification, because SAI alone would not remove greenhouse gases from the atmosphere.

On the geopolitical side, the technology’s potential to alter weather patterns and benefit certain regions at the expense of others could trigger sharp opposition by some nations. Others might seize on SAI’s benefits and back away from their commitment to carbon dioxide reductions. And, as with other breakthrough technologies, global norms and standards are lacking to guide the deployment and implementation of SAI.

I could go on, and on, and on, but rather than talk about the things that I find fascinating, let me stop here so that Judy and I can have a conversation and then I can take some of your questions. Again, thank you for inviting me back to the Council and thank you for your continued interest in our country’s foreign relations and national security.

Think for yourself, Decide for yourself What to do with it.
I'm sure it's time to raise this issue.

Surely, many have already noticed that strange traces of aircraft appeared in the sky, which do not disappear for many hours. There is no reliable information about this. The media is hushed up, on the forums, topics are pushed away and deleted where this cannot be done, crowds of trolls reduce the discussion to nothing, which is suggestive.

This article, unfortunately, does not indicate how the information was obtained, but nevertheless it deserves attention:

There is very little information about the exact composition of tanks on board aircraft that leave wide traces in the sky, the so-called chemtrails. However, the composition of chemtrails helps to understand the magnitude of the effects of chemtrails and understand why the sky becomes cloudy and takes on strange colors. Here is a basic list of contents in tanks on board both civilian and military aircraft:

● aluminum metal [causes Alzheimer's disease and breast cancer] (in the toothpaste article, information about waste aluminum - sodium fluoride - which is added to tubes to destroy children's teeth °);

● aluminum oxide Al2O3 [causes neurocognitive disorders, pneumoconiosis, asthma, pharyngitis, nasal irritation, conjunctivitis];

● barium [consequences - labored breathing, paralysis, anxiety, tremor, loss of strength, arrhythmia];

● bacilli and molds [meningitis, bacterial pneumonia, anthrax, erysipelas, endocarditis, necrotizing fasciitis (tissue death), Ritter's disease, toxic shock, pyemia];

● Pseudomonas aeruginosa [wound/burn infection, lung infection, urinary tract infection, ear infection/otitis media];

● Pseudomonas Fluorescens [pneumonia, urinary tract infection, burn infection; the main cause of infections in humans, manifested in the lungs - cystic fibrosis];

● Bacillus Amyloliquefaciens [spreads easily and quickly with water, is a carcinogen, also affects plants and vegetables];

● streptomyces [necrosis, pneumonia, cough, fever, other lung infections];

● enterobacteria: salmonella; E.Coli; including pathogens of bubonic plague and yersiniosis;

● Enterobacter Cloacae [respiratory tract infections, urinary tract infections, bacteremia];

● Serratia Marcscens [tear duct infections, conjunctivitis, endophthalmitis, keratitis, urinary tract infections, respiratory tract infections, gastrointestinal (GI) infections];

● Zn (zinc), Cd (cadmium), S (sulfur) [cause cancer, cell mutation, malignant melanoma, infertility];

● human leukocytes [used in research laboratories to recut and combine DNA];

● other bacilli and poisonous molds [meningitis, heart disease, gastrointestinal disease and acute respiratory infections];

● insects of unknown etymology...

Sincerely, Valentin Alexandrovich Tokarev (Igor Alexandrovich Fedorov)

Approximately 20 years ago, a global experiment began on the entire biosphere of the earth. Monstrous in scale, mysterious in purpose. Brazen and impudent in execution, as it happens openly, in front of everyone under the deafening silence of the media. The calculation is that the layman rarely looks up, and if he sees something, he does not analyze. All his thoughts are absorbed by personal and financial problems, the struggle for survival and the like. You can often hear the phrase - do you believe in chemtrails?
But are they God to believe in them or not to believe? Raise your head and there they are, ugly lines, white crooked scribbles. Dirty the sky, pretending to be clouds.

The plane is flying high. Behind him stretches a white thread. Draws a line on a blue background. And another plane is moving towards. The lines are crossed. Now there is a cross in the sky. But it does not disappear, but swells, spreads, fluffs out, like the tail of a frightened cat. There and other planes, lead their white stripes. Crosses, parallel lines and bars are their favorite handwriting.

At sunrise and sunset, the thick, fat jets of chemtrails look especially prominent with the backlight of the low sun.

The lines are knotty like intestinal motility, this is how the sprayer works. Sometimes the line breaks in the middle. This poison is over. Or the pilot flew off for lunch.

It happens all of a sudden that there are no chemtrails all day! A joyful hope is born - they changed their minds, they took pity on us! But no, it clears the space to start a new experiment from scratch. And then the next day, or even from the night, silver fleas begin to crawl across the sky in a businesslike manner.

Condensation streaks from aircraft engines in the sky.

Conspiracy theorists believe that governments are deliberately keeping people under control with poisons from aircraft emissions. Currently, reputable researchers have studied aspects of chemtrail theory for the first time.

16 08 2016
16:26

Governments want to control their population, control the weather, and control the food supply. So they spray chemicals through airborne emissions from aircraft. At least that's what some conspiracy theorists believe. Chemtrails or chemtrails are what they call contrails behind a flying aircraft. Recently, for the first time, scientists have scientifically explored everything that is hidden under this theory.

To do this, Christina Shearer of the University of California at Irvine presented 77 eminent atmospheric researchers with the data that the proponents of the theory cite as evidence. 49 experts had to evaluate and characterize the appearance of various contrails in photographs, 65 scientists studied the chemical analysis of the composition of the air.

Among the evidence and evidence for the chemtrail theory, its proponents often point out, among other things, the fact that sometimes contrails stay in the sky for too long. According to proponents of the theory, they should disappear much faster if they really were simple aircraft exhaust. In addition, supporters of the chemtrail theory point to an increased amount of strontium, barium and aluminum in snow and water samples, which implies that the population is being systematically poisoned.

Who paid for the research?

The study is the result of a collaboration between the Carnegie Institute of Science at Stanford, the University of California, Irvine, and Near Zero, a nonprofit dedicated to reducing pollutant emissions.

Do contrails last longer today than they did at the start of the era of flight?

"The study is mainly aimed at those people who have not yet decided whether or not to believe in the chemtrail theory," the researchers wrote in the journal Environmental Research Letters. Of all 77 experts, according to their own statements, only one of them found some indication of the presence of chemtrails.

Among 49 contrail experts, only 18 (37 percent) people confirmed that contrails remain in the sky longer today than at the beginning of the flight era. However, they reasoned, among other things, aircraft nowadays fly much higher and have more modern and more powerful engines. They release much more water vapor into the atmosphere. 23 experts (47 percent) did not agree at all with the main statement, the remaining eight experts did not give a clear answer.

When analyzing images of the four contrails that the conspiracy theorists use as evidence for their claim, the researchers also found no evidence of chemtrails.

How do such unusually thick inversion plumes appear?

So, for example, one of the pictures (see below) shows three contrails: one is thick and long and two are thinner and shorter. According to chemtrail theory, the differences arise because planes release chemicals at different lengths and intensities. Researchers interviewed found other explanations.

As explained by the experts, thicker streaks may form in areas of the atmosphere with more moisture. Others have argued that the tracks have this appearance due to the aircraft flying at a higher altitude. In addition, contrails, according to the researchers, are likely represented by different types of aircraft with different engine power.

Unusual indicators of barium in the atmosphere

Also, the atmospheric chemists interviewed, in their own words, did not find any evidence in their practice that speaks in favor of chemtrails. Only one of the researchers reported that he had come across an unusually high level of barium in the atmosphere sometime in a remote area. But evidence that the level of barium in the atmosphere was increased due to chemtrails, the scientist did not find.

Instead, researchers are questioning the basic methods of chemtrail theorists. An online statement on how best to collect water or snow samples to prove increased chemical levels states, for example: It is important to always collect some sediment along with the sample, i.e. deposits from the ground. "The sediments are naturally rich in trace metals. The concentration of chemicals in the sediment is not indicative of the composition of the overlying water," the researcher commented.

Comparison of the composition of air with the maximum permissible concentration of water

In addition, another observation raises doubts about the reliability and adequacy of the alleged chemtrail evidence. The researchers presented atmospheric scientists with analyzes of an air sample taken in May 2008 in Phoenix, Arizona. The content of barium, copper and manganese was measured in this sample. The chemtrail theory estimate suggests that the values ​​of all three substances studied are well above the usual limits.

The expert debunked the conspiracy theorist’s claim with just two sentences: “The values ​​are similar to all normal values ​​for soil or desert dust. The maximum allowable concentrations indicated are not relevant and, apparently, were taken from standard maximum allowable concentrations for drinking water,” he wrote. Indeed, in the analysis, maximum allowable concentrations of drinking water were established as a reference. They are among the most stringent, since drinking water should not contain almost any impurities.

"Changes in aircraft engineering may have caused contrails to stay in the sky longer, and industrial developments have contributed to increased particulate matter emissions in some regions," the researchers write. "But focusing all attention on a possible, secret, large-scale chemical program can easily divert public attention from the real environmental issues that need to be addressed immediately."

The study, however, has one weakness: since the experts interviewed knew what they were talking about, they could provide very specific desirable answers.

Chemtrails: what and why are sprayed all over the world.

Chemtrails or chemtrails are aircraft trails similar to regular contrails. However, it is believed that it is these "tails" of passenger aircraft that serve as sources of harmful, destructive microparticles and viruses.

Admirers of this theory believe that chemtrails are the contrail of an aircraft - a trail of condensed water vapor that is visible in the sky. It occurs behind flying vehicles and under certain conditions of the atmosphere.

What is the essence of this theory?

The condensation trail should be transparent and disappear after a few minutes. However, modern aircraft leave their “tail” for a long time. Scientists began to be alarmed by the duration of this phenomenon in the sky, so they began to conduct numerous studies.

The assumptions of scientists are based on microparticles of barium, aluminum, non-natural origin of organisms that were found under chemtrails. Scientists around the world are concerned about the current situation: such a quantity of harmful substances adversely affects the health of people, animals and the environment in general. This leads to massive epidemics, both people and animals.

So, one of the first people to write about chemtrails is Mike Blair.

American scientist and explorer. In his works, he describes in detail the composition of substances sprayed from aircraft:

• red and white corpuscles of human blood with onco-mutagenic parameters;
• enzymes and bacteria used in laboratories for;
• bacilli and enterobacteria.

He was also the first to mention Morgellons disease. In addition, the dangerous V2 virus was found by American microbiologist Calaham Macy in the area under chemtrails. And multiple cases of the influenza virus began to appear just in this territory.

It must be said that following this theory, pharmaceutical companies have excellent profits - a massive deterioration in immunity and an increase in the number of diseases cannot but benefit drug manufacturers. In addition, medical centers conduct testing and experimental treatment of patients.

Another proof is the huge barrels on which, without explanation, are loaded onto air vehicles.

Chemtrails or How epidemics are created

Global conspiracy?

If such a theory exists, then what lies beneath it? Scientists express different assumptions. There is an opinion that in this way the government and the "highest of this world." They are able to influence moods and the general condition of organisms as a whole.

It is believed that the US government in this way is trying to protect itself from the aggression of some individuals after the well-known sad events of September 11th. How? First of all, sprayed harmful substances affect the intellectual level of a person, making him “a little kinder” and more indulgent.

So, if you can influence individual organisms, then you can influence entire groups of people.

Preventing aggressive behavior, creating a certain mood under the influence of toxic substances is very convenient in managing the masses. First of all, it is convenient for politicians. Gather the required number of votes, bring people to a rally or even start a revolution - politicians will do anything for an easy chair in the office. Thus, we observe strife and aggression among the seemingly peaceful population.

We are being poisoned like rats by spraying chemicals from airplanes. Chemtrails

The theory of the "golden billion". How can chemtrails help with this?

Harmful uranium substances, barium and aluminum salts, polymer fibers, thorium, silicon carbide, found under chemtrails, slowly and imperceptibly affect the general condition of the human body. They are able to “give” a whole mountain of dangerous incurable diseases to a living organism. Recently, laboratory studies have confirmed that the mixture, which is sprayed from aircraft, contains microstructures. They work on the principle of pseudo-living microorganisms, the activators of which are uranium particles. Also, agents of the cholera virus, atypical pneumonia, AIDS were found in the sprayed formulations.

Thus, with the help of serious diseases it is possible to get rid of "simple" individuals.

The so-called representatives of the "billion" include elected residents of leading countries from around the world, such as the United States and Japan. But they, too, can be at risk. So, according to existing opinions, "selected" representatives of high society take antidotes. However, many questions and misunderstandings arise here: are there any that can protect against the influence of, for example, uranium? There is no single answer, of course.

Safe places on the map

Fans of the chemtrail theory say that maps will soon be created that clearly show where harmful substances are released into the atmosphere. So, according to the prevailing opinion, chemtrails do not run throughout the globe, but only in certain areas.

Thus, it is known that the subtropics of America and Africa, as well as some islands, are not subject to atmospheric emissions of substances from passenger and "pseudo-passenger" aircraft. It is believed that it is in these territories that organic food is grown for representatives of high society.

The chemtrail theory– this is just a guess. Skeptical people may not believe in a global and so cruel conspiracy against humanity. And there is every reason for this: there are no weighty arguments and exact facts. On the other hand, we cannot deny the detrimental effect of toxic substances on the environment and all living organisms in general. However, if scientists' assumptions about chemtrails are correct, then they have yet to prove this conspiracy theory.

Chemtrails: analysis of winter flights and stuffing of system bots | Chemtrails Russia 2015 | Chemtrails